The Pakistani Spectator

Conversation…………….BTW

 

(Yousuf & hameed ……….)

 

How many children do you have? (Yousuf)

 

 I have four daughters, by the grace of God, Almighty. (Hameed)

 

Ohh! (Yousuf)

 

 I have one daughter and three sons. (Yousuf)

 

Hmmn! May god bless them, (Hameed)

 

Don’t worry god will bless you with son. (Yousuf)

 

No! I am not worried at all. (Hameed)

 

 Thanks God he (the God) offered me my built-in desire to be the father of so many beautiful daughters.

 

I really love them very much. (Hameed)

 

In fact I never desired of, a baby boy. (Hameed)

 

I mean! One do desire, to have a son. (Yousuf)

 

Frankly I never had such a desire, from day one (Hameed)

 

Hmmn! (Yousuf)

 

(This was a true conversation between two people partly known to each other.

 

 

If at all, I extract and assess psyche of the two personnel’s in terms of psychological assessment of  behavior, I have no option but to tag hameed as humble, loving, and somewhat down to earth person having trait  and character more towards the theme of  supportive, accommodating and compassionate feel, towards female gender.

 

Where as! Yousuf seems to have a categorical dominant trait of unacceptability or rather rude behavior towards feminine gender.

 

 No backup whatsoever with relation to the social grooming of the two are available, except accessibility of few exposed facts with relative to their turnout and outlook in terms of personality and background of arrival; hence the same would not be the point of concern here.

 

Continuing the discussion with reference to the contest, it is some what an empirical truth that people like yousuf are more dominant numerically in terms of populace having a; categorical dominant trait of unacceptability or rather rude behavior towards feminine gender

 

 Why is it so, the same has many vengeance as myth but strictly sticking to behavior one may logically ask as judge  that; inspite of exposure to female as wife ,female  as mother and females as sister and daughter: why  such tendency, has infact, a question of scrutiny as, “why”?

 

To start with dig and denting, let’s have an input from the term behavior.

 

Behavior is a noiseless term with animated idea.

 

It is a phrase that is put for assessment, as impression of a person to a person or towards populace.

 

It is a way by which thoughts and thinking plights as indication, hence to ease the process of assessment, in terms of input.

 

It’s a hint to feel and plan untoward and unforeseen event with reference to the term in order to aware and care oneself or others, from ill fate, which may be a resident in mind of the expresser.

 

Behavior is a feed back of potential tendency that explains expected reaction under realm of exposure.

 

Many times, this term is used in affiliation with grooming.

 

Mostly it is used in defining one’s tone in relation with environment as previous exposure, habits, habitat, affiliated society, backgrounds, qualification and social mismatch as clash, of individual.

 

To some extent as major, this is a wrong definition as assessment.

 

In my opinion no community, at large and individual as single, is beyond the text of this term as free.

 

Human nature has no element of diversified range as character and quality.

 

Every individual belonging to any caste, cadre, community and ethnicity have similar traits of expression and reactions as built-in quality.

 

Similarly no logic as surrounding cum selection has its role on the run of behavior.

 

Brothers with different nature, though groomed and arising from same school as home, have expression of variant characteristic, though input as brought up have similar origin.

 

Residents in jungle, as animals, are not at all carnivores.

 

Here my point is! It’s the quality of perception to perceive thing that puts one in question and query of explanation of the term as behavior.

 

It is the way of feel and reacts as per ability or potential tendency that highlight the term, in definition of behavior.

 

Abilities and tendencies are terms which reflect potential space as quality or distinction.

 

To cut short people have variant and innate diversified remains as built-in character or quality or faults, may it be a potential element, but it’s the continuous input of individual as suppression or arousal of tendencies, as per his feel, sight or perception, which becomes their exhibition in terms of quality or expression as behavior.

 

This tendency to curb quality as character over quality, May it be favorable or faulty, creates and share expression in the contest of behavior.

 

Every individual have similar set of trait as inborn quality that reflects as ultimate behavior.

 

Since every individual is aware of his exceeding quality and his regressing trait and its outcome, his reaction on exposure to similar set of trait has calculated response as innate potential.

 

If you are exposed to malice and you have a set of antonym trait of malice and cruelty; you will retaliate.

 

 However if you have a trait synchronized with the term malice or cruelty; it’s more likely that the same term would be shared and response would be less or nil as retaliation.

 

 It means; the person has dominant quality of cruelty as trait.

 

 

Restricted sharing or reactive response, in exposed situation exhibiting quality as rage or fear, indicate opposite antonym of quality as trait.

 

This explains individual capacity to suppress the term as regressive or dominant trait, though  both are built in and present.

 

 

Likes and dislikes do not have a special bunch of feast, so to taste and declare thereafter its fitness as regard to liking or disliking.

 

Desire again revolves around the phenomenon of internal capacity of likes and dislikes and is governed by many modes as vehicle.

 

Desire is an instinctive factor and emerges from the root of fantasize mode as tendency.

 

Here it is to be distinguished that various hormonal surge are dependent and shuffle with instinctive approaches that are potential desire as acceptance and repellant and this activity has ever changing role in milieu interne.

 

Being part and parcel of trait and character, this hormonal derangement of ups and down as response; out rightly effect human behavior in terms of aggressiveness and acceptability as tendency.

 

Hitherto to current session, hormones have defined means and manner to mold and mild tendency and character.

 

It is this character that becomes trait hence exhibiting as behavior.

 

 This exhibition in terms of behavior reflects potential subconscious energy as change that is a precursor to hormonal imbalance.

 

Sustained rise and decrease in hormonal level always put its input as derangement in terms of personality, reaction and response hence molding and moving individual from ethical and rational language of term as normal.

 

Although such anomaly as deranged milieu interior always escapes attention in spectacular glance but critical observation and studies so to evaluate personality in terms of behavior reciprocate the deviation as potential hormonal cause.

 

Psychology and psychiatric assessment of such individual do highlight every such factor at grass root level which becomes the root cause of irrational thinking and thoughts hence to be tagged as organic disease.

 

In my opinion under no circumstances any individual with relative unjustified theme of explanation as opinion towards opposite gender as female should be left but with observation  to be tagged as potentially holding, organic backup as disease.

Trackback URL