@19: Already told you that Quaid has times and again said that MQM has no objections if the NRO is abolished.

if it was a matter of principles, your quaid would have opposed the NRO,

not to mention the reason behind the silence

Mr Magsi was talking to the convener of the subcommittee of the National Assembly’s Standing Committee on Environment, Ms Marvi Memon, who had called on him on Saturday to exchange views on water and environmental issues.

She sought his party’s suggestions on the issues and gave him a copy of the draft on proposals improvement of environment and water supply.

Mr Magsi bluntly told the PML-Q leader that Musharraf was a ruthless dictator and the politicians who helped him to trample over democracy, violate the Constitution and victimise the judiciary must apologise to the nation.

He refused to recognise the PML-Q as a political party and said that it was the brainchild of a military dictator and the establishment and B-team of Musharraf. This party had no future, Mr Magsi said.

>>>>>>>> This is what the Quaid emphasized in his recent address. If we talk of accountability, then this process should be guided by principles,rather than vendetta.

principles?

then how come altaf hussain did not oppose the NRO? even if he favoured it then why not do it without vendetta? are the principles only for others to follow?

<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>act of 3rd November2007 that he declared the emergency in the country as he deemed fit being President

read the proclaimation of the emergency it was declared in the capacity of CHIEF OF ARMY STAF !

>>>>>>>>>>Any how he did sign the promulgation orders as Chief of Staff for technical reasons best known to him. So you can read it as amended being as Chief of Staff; if you want to.
Does this make any difference?

no, it wont make a dictator any better, but the reason is not only known to him it also known to millions of other people around the world,

the difference of COAS declaring the emergency only confirms his steps as UNDEMOCRATIC,
it was to take away the legtimacy you were giving to mush over his steps

emergencies are never an option, but who declares them and under what sitiution makes the difference, read the highlighted/embolded part of comment # 6 and you too will come to know the exclusive”best known to him” reason

# 5

The man never ceased to be president till his last.

Any how he did sign the promulgation orders as Chief of Staff for technical reasons best known to him. So you can read it as amended being as Chief of Staff; if you want to.

Does this make any difference?

Yours 5 to 9

Ha ha ha

Now will you come out with something positive and pleasant also?