<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: We are Tamil and Pushtun Today</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pkhope.com/we-are-tamil-and-pushtun-today/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pkhope.com/we-are-tamil-and-pushtun-today/</link>
	<description>A Candid Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pakistani in Russia</title>
		<link>http://www.pkhope.com/we-are-tamil-and-pushtun-today/comment-page-1/#comment-897531</link>
		<dc:creator>Pakistani in Russia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 19:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pakspectator.com/?p=19171#comment-897531</guid>
		<description>Qaid-e-Azam was a secular man who was more concerned for the justice and economic development of Muslims of Pakistan.M.A Jinnah's first Foreign Minister was a Ahmedi Zafarullah Khan and Law Minister(Islamic law as well) was Jogindar Nath Mandal,a Hindu.
Can the Government today make a Hindu or a Ahmedi a Minister of Law? Mullahs will kill and be killed for such a Blasphemy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Qaid-e-Azam was a secular man who was more concerned for the justice and economic development of Muslims of Pakistan.M.A Jinnah&#8217;s first Foreign Minister was a Ahmedi Zafarullah Khan and Law Minister(Islamic law as well) was Jogindar Nath Mandal,a Hindu.<br />
Can the Government today make a Hindu or a Ahmedi a Minister of Law? Mullahs will kill and be killed for such a Blasphemy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eraj Danish</title>
		<link>http://www.pkhope.com/we-are-tamil-and-pushtun-today/comment-page-1/#comment-894433</link>
		<dc:creator>Eraj Danish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 11:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pakspectator.com/?p=19171#comment-894433</guid>
		<description>the ideology have to be gotten rid of from the root to get rid of extremism u see guys. We all have to unite and live as normal beings. That is what Mr. Jinnah perception was. He did not make Pakistan for extremism neither does our religion tells ur to bomb everyone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the ideology have to be gotten rid of from the root to get rid of extremism u see guys. We all have to unite and live as normal beings. That is what Mr. Jinnah perception was. He did not make Pakistan for extremism neither does our religion tells ur to bomb everyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pachaitamil</title>
		<link>http://www.pkhope.com/we-are-tamil-and-pushtun-today/comment-page-1/#comment-888203</link>
		<dc:creator>pachaitamil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 03:26:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pakspectator.com/?p=19171#comment-888203</guid>
		<description>Rajiv Gandhi is definitely a Peacenik who doesnt want to lose India's strategic stronghold on Sri Lanka, to China (India's primary rival). So he sent his "Indian 'Peace Keeping' force" and fought LTTE to help Sri Lanka with its "national integrity". He led the war to its full scale and thus secured India's image as a "Peace Keeping Messenger of the World" He died of the consequences. Had he didn't interfere in this matter, he would have been the Prime Minister of India now, and the future. What do you think?
'Every minority doesn't have the right to have its own land'. Guess who said these golden words.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rajiv Gandhi is definitely a Peacenik who doesnt want to lose India&#8217;s strategic stronghold on Sri Lanka, to China (India&#8217;s primary rival). So he sent his &#8220;Indian &#8216;Peace Keeping&#8217; force&#8221; and fought LTTE to help Sri Lanka with its &#8220;national integrity&#8221;. He led the war to its full scale and thus secured India&#8217;s image as a &#8220;Peace Keeping Messenger of the World&#8221; He died of the consequences. Had he didn&#8217;t interfere in this matter, he would have been the Prime Minister of India now, and the future. What do you think?<br />
&#8216;Every minority doesn&#8217;t have the right to have its own land&#8217;. Guess who said these golden words.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pachaitamil</title>
		<link>http://www.pkhope.com/we-are-tamil-and-pushtun-today/comment-page-1/#comment-888164</link>
		<dc:creator>pachaitamil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 02:44:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pakspectator.com/?p=19171#comment-888164</guid>
		<description>You are a half-filled-pot. You know nothing of the history of the Tamil Eelam - the country of tamils improperly and has used it as a tool to imply your anger on the Pushtuns.
The Tamils in Sri Lanka have settled there long before milleniums, as said in Ramayanam, the great indian epic. They had their own country separate from Sinhalese and they overpowered Sinhalese too. The Tamils in South India too had their own powerful land. It is the British imperialism that ruined their country. The British controlled the whole of Sri Lanka as a single colony and left it with all power to the Sinhalese. If the British had left the country leaving behind a federation of states as they did in India, the Tamils would have never thought of war. This is a fact as known to all Tamils apart from the LTTE. Tamils are not hindus. Tamil is a religion. Many of Prabhakaran's closest associates are Christians. The Muslims in Sri Lanka identify themselves as a separate community who came from Arabia, and did not want to take part in war. So, Prabhakaran chased them to Sinhalese areas so that they are not affected at the warfront as Tamils. Come to Tamilnadu and you'll know what secularism is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are a half-filled-pot. You know nothing of the history of the Tamil Eelam - the country of tamils improperly and has used it as a tool to imply your anger on the Pushtuns.<br />
The Tamils in Sri Lanka have settled there long before milleniums, as said in Ramayanam, the great indian epic. They had their own country separate from Sinhalese and they overpowered Sinhalese too. The Tamils in South India too had their own powerful land. It is the British imperialism that ruined their country. The British controlled the whole of Sri Lanka as a single colony and left it with all power to the Sinhalese. If the British had left the country leaving behind a federation of states as they did in India, the Tamils would have never thought of war. This is a fact as known to all Tamils apart from the LTTE. Tamils are not hindus. Tamil is a religion. Many of Prabhakaran&#8217;s closest associates are Christians. The Muslims in Sri Lanka identify themselves as a separate community who came from Arabia, and did not want to take part in war. So, Prabhakaran chased them to Sinhalese areas so that they are not affected at the warfront as Tamils. Come to Tamilnadu and you&#8217;ll know what secularism is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

