US May Attack, But Pakistan Will Not Attack US
By Dr. Hassan Isfahani • Sep 15th, 2008 • Category: Politics • 2 CommentsNow that is what one call the loyal ally in the war against terror, and that is why George W. Bush always termed Pakistan as the favorite ally of America in the war against terror and that is why, Pakistan always maintained that it was not just the war of US, but it’s own war, and now as United States has started attacking the Pakistani territory at will and killing people daily, Pakistani premier has candidly said that come what may, but Pakistan wouldn’t be attacking the US and waging war against the NATO forces.
But then the Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani meekly pledged to raise the issue of US threats to Pakistan’s territorial integrity at the international level to resolve it through diplomacy and said that right to launch an offensive against the terrorists solely rested with Pakistan as the government was capable of taking an effective action within the country.
Chief of Army Staff General Ashfaq Parvez Kayani is acting more pragmatically and he is using stern language against the sabre rattling of US in North Waziristan, but he is also more cautious and resting his chips on the political leaders. He said that all elements of the national power under new democratic leadership would safeguard the territorial integrity of Pakistan with full support and backing of the people.
No wonder, sovereignty of Pakistan has become a joke and nobody respects a joke. People laugh it out.
Trackback URL
|
|
|
Click For More Articles By Dr. Hassan Isfahani
Bear With Me Please.
All posts by Dr. Hassan Isfahani
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
So what do you want dr! Do you want to attack a global power in terms of nation?
Just because, the same is of the opinion that demanded terrorist are hiding at your place of boundaries.
Can you deny or defy the facts in negation?
Or do you have any other justification of the alleged information?
Dr we need to understand the ethical basis of rational answering.
Issues related to controversy that becomes the part of conflict can not be set aside.
Later happening as disaster are always resultant of the unsolved myth or unattended request, whether iatrogenic or involuntary.
Response as retaliation under the rule of thumb as nation is always platform based with sorting order of preferences and priorities.
Such are considered in the books of ethical practice of standard norms of notion as nation and are obligatory essential before any conflict turns a u turn.
Any country whether authoritarian or under the influence of another have had to go through the laid procedure of diplomatic proceedings as chartered of duty.
Under no, means till solution to ease the rift has been prescribed can become the part and parcel of our policy unless and until threat that could really impeach the integrity.
In my opinion and up till now available data of current issue base available information as articles, news and slogans, magnitude of hubbub and jambalaya , it is evident that our people have gone and entered in to a limited span of emotional instability due to few continuous wrong misdirected move of these NATO forces thereby tagging the whole scenic view in the controversy of conflict.
In my perception a meaningful episode as conflict is yet to be assembled before such slogan can become the notion.
Precisely and commendably, I have a belief as faith that inshalllah we will effectively get out of the disgusting discussion of rampage and rampart.
Pakistan army with American dollar in their pockets, flying an updated F16, wearing American night vision goggles are working towards the future.
and silly Re-tired Pak Army officers are living in a fools paradise