The Pakistani Spectator

A Candid Blog



The Beat Goes On

By Prof. Michael Brenner • Jun 14th, 2009 • Category: Politics, Worth A Second Look • 5 Comments

Rooted dogma is tenacious – especially when well fertilized by fear.  America’s ‘War on Terror’ is going at full throttle after briefly pausing in neutral during the presidential transition.  For all the talk of ‘change’ there is nothing different about how the Obama administration either defines the country’s interests or its audacious global strategy for advancing them.  Washington remains dedicated to rooting out ‘terror’ wherever radical Islamist groups raise their heads.  The scope is astonishingly broad: Mali to Somalia to Palestine to Pakistan’s Northwest Frontier Province and every place in between.  The unchanging means are mainly generous applications of military might.  The prospects for ‘success’ are as dim at the goal is ambitious – especially so since we have been given no crisp statement of what ‘success’ amounts to, other than eliminating from vast territories on two continents anyone whom we decide is a danger to the United States.

This outcome should not surprise us.  Barack Obama is a conventional thinker on every matter of consequence, be it foreign affairs, the financial meltdown, or the use and misuse of the intelligence apparatus.  He seems never to have encountered an establishment to which he does not instinctively tip his cap in respect.  He promised us a bigger war in Afghanistan; we have gotten it.  He promised us more aggressive action in Pakistan; we have gotten it.  He vowed to protect America by every means possible from our enemies; he has been unstinting in using all available methods to that end regardless of the price.  The only promises he has not fulfilled are to end the United States’ combat role in Iraq and to place firm, transparent restrictions on illegal or libertarian compromised actions by the Executive Branch.  In Iraq, he is engaging in the masquerade of relabeling American combat brigades as support and training units.  On the exercise of police powers, he has gone to court repeatedly to defend the practices introduced by the Bush presidency while blocking Congressional initiatives to curb them.  On no occasion has the president seen fit to spell out candidly the justification, the premises, and the risks attached to these policies.  A decent respect for his fellow Americans, and to posterity, command that he do so,

Fear of the elusive enemy that we have named ‘international terrorism’ since 9/11 is still the driving force.  Obama has pronounced its destruction the top priority of his administration, albeit toning down some of his predecessor’s overheated rhetoric.  He has not qualified the inflated importance it has been given.  Our massive commitment in this cause is accepted by Americans for only one reason: the lingering dread that it could happen again.  The connections between any plausible, concrete threat and our sweeping actions remain as obscure as ever. The possibility that our actions may actually increase the danger is ignored.  Blind trust and faith join with fear as substitutes for the prudent deliberations of a mature democracy.

Other dubious ingredients of our project to make the world safe for America are still in place.  They are as simple as they are objectionable.  They also are familiar.  One, the United States has the ability to work its will wherever so long as we are united and dedicated.  Two, we are able to arrange the political affairs of other peoples however alien in culture and tradition.  Three, a world built according to our design and managed by us is both attainable and in everyone’s interest.  Four, countries as diverse as Pakistan, India, Iran, Russia and China will come to see the truth of the above if we are persuasive enough and high-minded in our enlightened thinking.  They too will view the world through the terrorism optic.  Five, the future of NATO will be decided amidst the poppy fields of Helmand Province; and perhaps the fate of the West itself in the high valleys of the Hindu Kush.

Americans’ uncritical readiness to subscribe to these propositions testifies to our enduring conviction in American exceptionalism and the power of positive thinking.  It confirms as well an exceptional capacity for self-delusion.  Despite the Iraq fiasco, and serial failures elsewhere in the Greater Middle East, the nation’s political class is almost as one in thinking that we can make it work in Afghanistan – on the second or third try.  This belief is compounded of several small delusions.  To cite an example: Afghans – unlike Iraqis – really do not mind our occupying their country since we got rid of the Taliban for them.  It is apiece with other chimeras in the region, e.g. if we brutalize the Palestinians enough they will abandon Hamas for Mr. Abbas.

Games of make-believe are for kids – not great powers.

This assessment is not offered as realism or idealism, certainly not as neo-isolationism.  It is a plea for honesty.  If indeed there is a convincing case to be made that it is a vital national interest to pursue the ‘war on terror’ around the globe, and to infringe on our freedoms at home, let that case be made clearly and dispassionately.  Let there be a genuine public debate.  Let us make the elementary distinction between aspiring to everything we want to be and everything we can be. We owe ourselves nothing less. If the conclusion favors going forward, let us do so with eyes wide open.  Instead, we are embarking on another magic mystery tour – with goals as elusive as the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow.


 

 

 
Trackback URL

Tagged as: , , , , , , , , ,

Click For More Articles By Prof. Michael Brenner Dr. Michael Brenner is a Non-Resident Fellow at the Center for Transatlantic Relations. He publishes and teaches in the fields of American foreign policy, Euro-American relations, and the European Union. He is also Professor of International Affairs at the University of Pittsburgh. Brenner is the author of numerous books, and over 60 articles and published papers on a broad range of topics.
All posts by Prof. Michael Brenner
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

5 Responses »

  1. George W Bush was got elected as President of United States to be used as a tool in the hands of Pentagon for ‘The Project for the New American Century (PNAC) to spread the US planned hegemony in the world and the man pursuing the given plan brought a havoc in the world. Million are crushed to death, many more million displaced and many countries destroyed, occupied and people are subjugated, shackled which includes friends as well as declared foes.

    Having realised that United States is seen as the savage oppressor and the exterminator in present day and time and that its image has considerably been damaged; a fresh black fox of deception in the shape of Obama is brought up on the scene to serve US interests.

    Where George W Bush was a true tool of savagery produce by United States; Obama is the biggest tool of deception that Pentagon can ever produce and make use to repair the US image and its credibility.

    Obama plans are not the plan of ‘Shock and Awe’ like we saw in Iraq but with deceptive softly softly approach especially to ask the entire Muslim world to submit to the will and authority of United state in its totality.

    Habib Jalib says:

    [ Dushman kahaan badaltay hain; Faqat cheray badaltay hain]
    [Ajab hey apnaa saffar; keh faslay bhi saath chaltay hain]

    My savage killers they don’t change; only they change their faces and flags.
    What a journey that I am trekking? All the milestones that I traverse also keep on travelling with me.

  2. Dear Prof Brenner,
    What the world may say or you say the truth of the matter is Neocon Bush managed to save the mainland USA from any more 9/11. It is not that the Jihadies didnot try. They tried and failed and that is honest truth. yOUR LEADERS WILL ALWAYS FIGHT THE WARS IN OTHER LANDS.
    The whiteman always uses the browns, blacks and yellows to do their bidding by open threat or persuasion.See how the Taliban ( a force created by your nation and margret Thatcher) has suddenly turned from “”frreedom fighters”" to ” terrorists!!!The taliban are being killed by its own trainers the ISI.The 4 million IDPs created by pakistan Army is testimony to that philosophy.
    See the comment by A Khokar who will blame Obama,Bush but not Saudi Arabia which is the fountainhead of Wahabism and which is at the root of all Terrorism in the world and who always follow the path laid down by your nation while it is foollish pakistan which is carrying the JIHADI BABY with 4 million of its own citizens escaping from LIBERATION OF ITS ARMY.

  3. Johann,

    America is on her spree to have secured its hegemonic goals in our areas to gain a control on the economic natural resources in Arab lands and in the Central Asia. American along with their allies are here after treading a long journey from a far off lands and after crossing many seas.

    Where as, the Saudi quest; if there it is, as you keep on bolstering that they are found funding for the spread of Islamic hegemony—- in olden days it was called as; Pan Islamism; well they have the right to pursue their ambitions, what ever they have.

    Reportedly they are the flag bearer of Islam and carry a right full divine message; no matter what all people come up with their plans to malign this divine message or join hands to conspire and force a set back to it but the divinity has to appear more shiningly and it does establish it’s self—- positively.

    The present day democracy that we find ourselves in its bliss; in order to defend it self or the adopted ways of life style; its promoters keep on exercising the most atrocious and subversive plans. They keep us fear full paranoid all the times and engaged—- but if you see closely democracy at its base simply is a name of stalemate.

  4. No divine message may spread or make its home in the heart of its believers through terrorism.

    Islam is divine, a message of peace, wisdom and enlightenment—– and terrorism is its adversary.

  5. Prof
    what kind of nation you are.You are still looking for public debate.Your ex president bush claimed in front of public that it was intelligence failure in Iraq about WMD.Your army has converted three countries into debris through your arms industry for distributing peace culture in our areas.
    what kind of accountability you own in your system.911 was itself a failure of local security agencies along with your first class intelligence washout.No one in US MANAGEMENT never accepted their negligence but were ready to attack on those poor muslims countries where heads were once said as touts of US.
    You people can see water sources in mars through your updated technology but search of Osama under thousands of dead bodies is still a mystery for whole world.So instead of giving justice to poor victims of war you are not daring to demand any kind of accountability for your war loving groups in US parliament.

Leave a Reply (Read Comment Policy)

TPS has started observing minimal and mainly automatic comments moderation. Our automatic moderation tool tries to moderate comments on the basis of inappropriate keywords. If you feel that your valid and proper comment has been moderated, then please let us know, and we will promptly look into it. If you feel that an inappropriate comment has been ignored by tool, then let us know please, and we will check it. Thanks for your visit and help.