“Holy Quran is 60% extract of other holy books and other 40% is strongly related with Arab culture where it was actually started”…………..

What rubbish! You must and shall dare before floating such ideas.

May I undertake this phrase as; that 40 of Qoran is not for the humanity and is for the Arab only whereas 60 percent is what Islam is?

It must be your own version of Qoran miss.

This is what I floated as idea that wrong interpretation similarly like your version is the main cause of this version of talibanic breed and mess.

I don’t want to further escalate this nonsense discussion of yours.

Keep the good for yourself.

Nop! They do not represent Islam but rather;

They claim their acts as true Islam.

Representation by definition explains authoritative grant of power of attorney where representative’s acts are representation of the authority for which these acts are carried out.

Since there is no such authoritative dispensing as grant hence under no means their or even my acts may be tagged as unanimous representation or symbol

Infact it’s a claim.

There is a great difference between the two terms representation and claim, as phrase.

I suppose I may not and shall not; route further explanation to these terms since, they are up to the level of theme understandable.

My dear if you had gone through the article you must have familiarized your self that difference of interpretation of the holy book and Sunnah especially towards practices and thereof its ultimate implications and further implementation has resulted in to this controversy of right and righteous.

Johann it’s a difficult position and can not be under stood, but with a logic.

When you say you are a Christian, Hindu or a Muslim, it eventually explains practices and belief since, there are; a laid down procedural conviction or modes being a follower, once you are under the faith as principle of belief of the religion.

This belief as conviction under the rule of follower is always taken as baseline or fence of religion; thereby rejecting all concepts other than but the one; that is being sworn as belief.

A Muslim is declared Muslim when he accepts monotheistic concept as God (Same as in Christianity and Judaism) and a similar essential belief as declaration of (Muhammad SAWAW) as last prophet.

This is the basic conceptual symbol as obligation of Islam as essential belief as prerequisite, under the rule of religion being a Muslim.

From here rules of practices have defined and declared visionary concepts of perception as interpretation.

Human by nature have ability and instinct to evaluate surrounds and around as per rule of interpretation.

This may be an observation, assumptions, prediction, inference, evaluation, experiments hence invent as discovery by any available means of interpretation putting it within the interpreted thought as version, postulates and theory.

This concept relies and ultimate procure law thus easing their way and consoling mind as future practice.

This rule of interpretation and its preliminary numerical steps applies where rules are laid down for future.

But if this theory as law is already a declared phenomenon as truth; in the format of open vocabularies concept as book (May it be bible or Qoran) and similar concept of practical version and virtual image of the book as prophet (SAWAW), which is called Sunnah in Islam; logic demand and direct open discussion.

Open field as declared laws under such rules of logic; though remains the same but the rule of take as understanding, evaluation and therefore interpretation depends upon their own sources of obligations and understanding as long as basic rules of book remains the same.

It is this point of debate where interpretation differs among the follower.

Why is it so; you may call it an innate human tendency which always directs thought towards motivated desire to perceive things as per their interpretation; once they get chance of open field free from obligation and compulsion of laid criteria.

It is here where understanding derives its essence as practice from grounds that are put as backups, grooming, tendencies, abilities and every such factor that may be dominant among the perceiver.

This perception and reception therefore to deduce as interpret can not be cordoned or confiscated or trialed if rules of law has an extracted interpreted version as far as one keeps basic belief as legitimate.

Under the ethics of dictionary; procured idea of individual in terms of interpretation can not be tagged or put as representation hence symbol.

As far as blasphemy and similar rules as law should be applied to these Taliban; it is again a subject that demands logical crossover which resides on belief of the two basic laws for being a Muslim.

Since these Taliban are within the declared acceptance of belief as prerequisite which necessitate being Muslim; they are being spared.

Though! My personal view is any one violating the true image of this basic assumption as law; should be liable and trialed since its not just rules as law that is to be followed but; practices remains the image of real picture.

One more thing that needs to be understood is the punishment as jurisprudence in Islamic perspective.

Without controversially litigating shariah as law or jurisprudence under principle of belief of Islam; there should be one general understanding for all; May it be Muslim or otherwise that, all laws and their punishment in Islam, as been laid down as criterion; is a definite part of acceptance but prosecution under such acts is again a necessary part of religion.

Under this belief awarder and awardee have prerequisites that must fulfill as compulsion before dispensing punishment in its real format.

It is not like that any dick, Harry, and wijhay or salaam would stand and award punishment without fulfilling strict criteria of such awards.

This is a similar obligation as prerequisite of Islam and in my opinion Taliban’s have distorted this image of Islam by setting it aside or breaching the real path of truth as compulsory obligation therefore exploiting real picture of Islam.

This criterion to dispense punishment in real theme of format has strict compliance as pious, obedience and truthful practitioner and under the protocol of prerogatives as Islamic state based on scholastic attitude of clerical acceptance as scholar; which these Taliban’s are not even up to the mark or entry qualifier.

In my opinion sanctioned punishments as Islamic laws indicate severity of crime with respect to intensity of penalty.

Punishments are mode to herald crime and intensity of punishment reflects graveness of the issue.

Murder is an offence that awards death penalty if proven though, legislations and implementations in different countries and religion have different protocols as practice depending upon their rules as laws.

Under the rule, every acts of Taliban are against the concept of Islamic law and practice since they do not comply or imply basics and compulsive obligatory essentials of prerequisite.

But since they are within the basic belief as Muslim they can not be trialed under rule of general consensus among few sects of Islam.

Though in my personal opinion! I disregard and discard their practice and attitude; as against Islam and Islamic concept of peace and humble treat and hence ready to treat them under the rule of your desire as blasphemy.

Regards

Give me little time to come up with the query as your right.

Once again a very authentic ask?

please grant time to sum up my personal work .Regards