<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shameless</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pkhope.com/shameless/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pkhope.com/shameless/</link>
	<description>A Candid Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 03:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ria</title>
		<link>http://www.pkhope.com/shameless/comment-page-1/#comment-816179</link>
		<dc:creator>Ria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 14:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pakspectator.com/?p=17958#comment-816179</guid>
		<description>Really? What do you need to fight terrorism? I'm sure you, in your long stint as a political expert, must know. For God's sake. Be realistic and quit the blame game and derogatory expression. It's so damn easy to blame the 'indifferent attitude' of the leaders. How about the constant backlash of grossly inaccurate harsh criticism and lack of support from the people?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really? What do you need to fight terrorism? I&#8217;m sure you, in your long stint as a political expert, must know. For God&#8217;s sake. Be realistic and quit the blame game and derogatory expression. It&#8217;s so damn easy to blame the &#8216;indifferent attitude&#8217; of the leaders. How about the constant backlash of grossly inaccurate harsh criticism and lack of support from the people?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nazia</title>
		<link>http://www.pkhope.com/shameless/comment-page-1/#comment-805762</link>
		<dc:creator>nazia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 17:50:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pakspectator.com/?p=17958#comment-805762</guid>
		<description>@5
congratulation to all viewers after two years of effort ultimately AOM had got his name in @5 .
Try to hide or reveal with any name.
Your love will be uncovered by all styles you adopt.
This is really form of true  and immortal love  .

Raj
You are not wrong whenever the formation of sister organizations demanded from major company there are always hidden interests of influential groups to get control of company as per desires.
But with good intention that newly born sister organizations can take lead on orginal company by giving opportunity to negelcted class by earlier management.
So there is no harm in division but I accept failures to some extent and in few fields in this partition that are being  dangerously concentrated if not corrected .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@5<br />
congratulation to all viewers after two years of effort ultimately AOM had got his name in @5 .<br />
Try to hide or reveal with any name.<br />
Your love will be uncovered by all styles you adopt.<br />
This is really form of true  and immortal love  .</p>
<p>Raj<br />
You are not wrong whenever the formation of sister organizations demanded from major company there are always hidden interests of influential groups to get control of company as per desires.<br />
But with good intention that newly born sister organizations can take lead on orginal company by giving opportunity to negelcted class by earlier management.<br />
So there is no harm in division but I accept failures to some extent and in few fields in this partition that are being  dangerously concentrated if not corrected .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: khurshid alam khan</title>
		<link>http://www.pkhope.com/shameless/comment-page-1/#comment-804770</link>
		<dc:creator>khurshid alam khan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 12:06:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pakspectator.com/?p=17958#comment-804770</guid>
		<description>Pak Economy in 1999 was: $ 75 billion (Source)
Pak Economy in 2007 is: $ 160 billion (Source) and (Source)
Pak Economy in 2008 is: $ 170 billion (Source)

 

GDP Growth in 1999:  3.1 % (Source)

GDP Growth in 2005:  8.4 % (Source)

GDP Growth in 2007:  7 % (Source)

GDP Growth in 2009:  2 % (Source) and (Source)

 

GDP Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) in 1999: $ 270 billion (Source)
GDP Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) in 2007: $ 475.5 billion (Source)
GDP Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) in 2008: $ 504.3 billion (Source)

 

GDP per Capita Income in 1999: $ 450 (Source)
GDP per Capita Income in 2007: $ 926 (Source)

GDP per Capita Income in 2008: $1085 (Source)

 

Pak revenue collection 1999: Rs. 305 billion (Source)
Pak revenue collection 2007: Rs. 708 billion (Source) and (Source)

Pak revenue collection 2008: Rs. 990 billion (Source)

 

Pak Foreign reserves in 1999: $ 1.96 billion (Source)
Pak Foreign reserves in 2007: $ 16.4 billion (Source) and (Source)

Pak Foreign reserves in 2008: $ 8.89 billion (Source)

Pak Foreign reserves in 2009: $ 14.4 billion (Source)

 

Pak Exports in 1999: $ 8 billion (Source)
Pak Exports in 2007: $ 18.5 billion (Source)

Pak Exports in 2008: $ 19.22 billion (Source) and (Source)

 

Textile Exports in 1999: $ 5.5 billion (Source)
Textile Exports in 2007: $ 11.2 billion (Source)

 

KHI stock exchange 1999: $ 5 billion at 700 points
KHI stock exchange 2007: $ 75 billion at 14,000 points (Source)
KHI stock exchange 2008: $ 46 billion at 9,300 points (Source) and $20 billion at 4,972 points (Source) 

KHI stock exchange 2009: $ 26.5 billion (Source) at 9,000 points (Source)

 

Foreign Investment in 1999: $ 301 million (Source)
Foreign Investment in 2007: $ 8.4 billion (Source)

Foreign Investment in 2008: $ 5.19 billion (Source)

 

Large Scale Manufacturing (LSM) in 1999: 1.5% ( Source)

Large Scale Manufacturing (LSM) in 2005: 19.9% (Source)

Large Scale Manufacturing (LSM) in 2007: 8.6% (Source)

Large Scale Manufacturing (LSM) in 2008: 4.8%  (Source)

 

Debt (External Debt &#38; Liabilities) in 1988: $ 18 billion

Debt (External Debt &#38; Liabilities) in 1999: $ 39 billion (Source) and (Source)

Debt (External Debt &#38; Liabilities) in 2007: $ 40.17 billion (Source)

Debt (External Debt &#38; Liabilities) in 2009: $ 50.1 billion (Source)

 

Debt servicing 1999: 65% of GDP (Source) and (Source)
Debt servicing 2007: 28% of GDP (Source) and (Source) 

Debt servicing 2008: 27% of GDP (Source)

 

Poverty level in 1999: 34% (Source) and (Source)
Poverty level in 2007: 24% (Source) and (Source)

 

Literacy rate in 1999: 45% (Source)
Literacy rate in 2007: 53% (Source)

 

Pak Development programs 1999: Rs. 80 billion (Source)
Pak Development programs 2007: Rs. 520 billion (Source)
Pak Development programs 2008: Rs. 549.7 billion (Source)

 

© Our leader – Musharraf
Posted in Afreen Baig, Pakistan Economy &#124; Tags: Afreen Baig, Economic Indicators, Exports, FDI, Foreign Debt, Foreign Reserves, GDP, KSE, LSM, Mirza Rohail, Pakistan Economy, PSDP
« Overall Vision of Our leader –</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pak Economy in 1999 was: $ 75 billion (Source)<br />
Pak Economy in 2007 is: $ 160 billion (Source) and (Source)<br />
Pak Economy in 2008 is: $ 170 billion (Source)</p>
<p>GDP Growth in 1999:  3.1 % (Source)</p>
<p>GDP Growth in 2005:  8.4 % (Source)</p>
<p>GDP Growth in 2007:  7 % (Source)</p>
<p>GDP Growth in 2009:  2 % (Source) and (Source)</p>
<p>GDP Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) in 1999: $ 270 billion (Source)<br />
GDP Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) in 2007: $ 475.5 billion (Source)<br />
GDP Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) in 2008: $ 504.3 billion (Source)</p>
<p>GDP per Capita Income in 1999: $ 450 (Source)<br />
GDP per Capita Income in 2007: $ 926 (Source)</p>
<p>GDP per Capita Income in 2008: $1085 (Source)</p>
<p>Pak revenue collection 1999: Rs. 305 billion (Source)<br />
Pak revenue collection 2007: Rs. 708 billion (Source) and (Source)</p>
<p>Pak revenue collection 2008: Rs. 990 billion (Source)</p>
<p>Pak Foreign reserves in 1999: $ 1.96 billion (Source)<br />
Pak Foreign reserves in 2007: $ 16.4 billion (Source) and (Source)</p>
<p>Pak Foreign reserves in 2008: $ 8.89 billion (Source)</p>
<p>Pak Foreign reserves in 2009: $ 14.4 billion (Source)</p>
<p>Pak Exports in 1999: $ 8 billion (Source)<br />
Pak Exports in 2007: $ 18.5 billion (Source)</p>
<p>Pak Exports in 2008: $ 19.22 billion (Source) and (Source)</p>
<p>Textile Exports in 1999: $ 5.5 billion (Source)<br />
Textile Exports in 2007: $ 11.2 billion (Source)</p>
<p>KHI stock exchange 1999: $ 5 billion at 700 points<br />
KHI stock exchange 2007: $ 75 billion at 14,000 points (Source)<br />
KHI stock exchange 2008: $ 46 billion at 9,300 points (Source) and $20 billion at 4,972 points (Source) </p>
<p>KHI stock exchange 2009: $ 26.5 billion (Source) at 9,000 points (Source)</p>
<p>Foreign Investment in 1999: $ 301 million (Source)<br />
Foreign Investment in 2007: $ 8.4 billion (Source)</p>
<p>Foreign Investment in 2008: $ 5.19 billion (Source)</p>
<p>Large Scale Manufacturing (LSM) in 1999: 1.5% ( Source)</p>
<p>Large Scale Manufacturing (LSM) in 2005: 19.9% (Source)</p>
<p>Large Scale Manufacturing (LSM) in 2007: 8.6% (Source)</p>
<p>Large Scale Manufacturing (LSM) in 2008: 4.8%  (Source)</p>
<p>Debt (External Debt &amp; Liabilities) in 1988: $ 18 billion</p>
<p>Debt (External Debt &amp; Liabilities) in 1999: $ 39 billion (Source) and (Source)</p>
<p>Debt (External Debt &amp; Liabilities) in 2007: $ 40.17 billion (Source)</p>
<p>Debt (External Debt &amp; Liabilities) in 2009: $ 50.1 billion (Source)</p>
<p>Debt servicing 1999: 65% of GDP (Source) and (Source)<br />
Debt servicing 2007: 28% of GDP (Source) and (Source) </p>
<p>Debt servicing 2008: 27% of GDP (Source)</p>
<p>Poverty level in 1999: 34% (Source) and (Source)<br />
Poverty level in 2007: 24% (Source) and (Source)</p>
<p>Literacy rate in 1999: 45% (Source)<br />
Literacy rate in 2007: 53% (Source)</p>
<p>Pak Development programs 1999: Rs. 80 billion (Source)<br />
Pak Development programs 2007: Rs. 520 billion (Source)<br />
Pak Development programs 2008: Rs. 549.7 billion (Source)</p>
<p>© Our leader – Musharraf<br />
Posted in Afreen Baig, Pakistan Economy | Tags: Afreen Baig, Economic Indicators, Exports, FDI, Foreign Debt, Foreign Reserves, GDP, KSE, LSM, Mirza Rohail, Pakistan Economy, PSDP<br />
« Overall Vision of Our leader –</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jahzebel</title>
		<link>http://www.pkhope.com/shameless/comment-page-1/#comment-803805</link>
		<dc:creator>jahzebel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 05:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pakspectator.com/?p=17958#comment-803805</guid>
		<description>Enough with the Pakistan gravy train from the US! I as an American female (who lived in PK for years and has visited many times since) am *fed* up with the wretched ingrates taking my money and not doing the needful with it. Everyone in Pakistan has their hand out. Namely you took our money - my taxpayers money, my blood sweat and tears - and put it into weapons and arms to throttle at India and the rest was put into the pockets of you know who. Not a single Rupee spent to help the poor and the masses and - worse yet - not a single Rupee was spent on fighting and cleaning out the Al Qaeda who killed 3000 of my citizens in one go and who are now killing your citizens and who have been hiding in plain sight in your country for what, like almost 10 years now?? And please spare me - if you want to go on in denial of who is behind the attacks, do I really need to explain that the CIA or Blackwater/Xe isn't remotely interested in blowing up your mosques or your girl schools or especially your Marriot hotels! (we got married in one of those, in fact) If you want the US out then please put up or shut up, and stop eating out of my hand already! And when the Taliban takes over your country your women can taste Taliban like never before! They way they treated my Secretary of State, you'd think they almost wanted it! - angry umereekun</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enough with the Pakistan gravy train from the US! I as an American female (who lived in PK for years and has visited many times since) am *fed* up with the wretched ingrates taking my money and not doing the needful with it. Everyone in Pakistan has their hand out. Namely you took our money - my taxpayers money, my blood sweat and tears - and put it into weapons and arms to throttle at India and the rest was put into the pockets of you know who. Not a single Rupee spent to help the poor and the masses and - worse yet - not a single Rupee was spent on fighting and cleaning out the Al Qaeda who killed 3000 of my citizens in one go and who are now killing your citizens and who have been hiding in plain sight in your country for what, like almost 10 years now?? And please spare me - if you want to go on in denial of who is behind the attacks, do I really need to explain that the CIA or Blackwater/Xe isn&#8217;t remotely interested in blowing up your mosques or your girl schools or especially your Marriot hotels! (we got married in one of those, in fact) If you want the US out then please put up or shut up, and stop eating out of my hand already! And when the Taliban takes over your country your women can taste Taliban like never before! They way they treated my Secretary of State, you&#8217;d think they almost wanted it! - angry umereekun</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raj</title>
		<link>http://www.pkhope.com/shameless/comment-page-1/#comment-803405</link>
		<dc:creator>Raj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 00:41:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pakspectator.com/?p=17958#comment-803405</guid>
		<description>THIS IS NOT NEW...AND THERE IS A REASON/ EXPLNATION BEHIND IT

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/06/weekinreview/06burns.html?pagewanted=2

When the struggle for Indian independence began in earnest in the 1920’s, the leadership rested mainly with Hindus — especially Gandhi, whose philosophy was egalitarian, secular and nationalist. In the 1930’s, the Muslim League began agitating for a separate Muslim homeland, but power within the league rested with Mohammed Ali Jinnah, an elitist, British-educated Bombay lawyer with a taste for expensively-tailored suits and little affinity for the common man. He would become Pakistan’s founding father.

Many of those who gathered around Jinnah were from the feudal landowning class, and tribal leaders. With scant interest in democracy, their concerns centered more on the protection of their ancestral privileges.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THIS IS NOT NEW&#8230;AND THERE IS A REASON/ EXPLNATION BEHIND IT</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/06/weekinreview/06burns.html?pagewanted=2" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/06/weekinreview/06burns.html?pagewanted=2</a></p>
<p>When the struggle for Indian independence began in earnest in the 1920’s, the leadership rested mainly with Hindus — especially Gandhi, whose philosophy was egalitarian, secular and nationalist. In the 1930’s, the Muslim League began agitating for a separate Muslim homeland, but power within the league rested with Mohammed Ali Jinnah, an elitist, British-educated Bombay lawyer with a taste for expensively-tailored suits and little affinity for the common man. He would become Pakistan’s founding father.</p>
<p>Many of those who gathered around Jinnah were from the feudal landowning class, and tribal leaders. With scant interest in democracy, their concerns centered more on the protection of their ancestral privileges.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nazia</title>
		<link>http://www.pkhope.com/shameless/comment-page-1/#comment-802676</link>
		<dc:creator>nazia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 17:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pakspectator.com/?p=17958#comment-802676</guid>
		<description>Shame less is very small word for such satanic characters,Our word masters of TPS should find some suitable word for such creatures that fit with their extreme dishonesty and incompetence as such.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shame less is very small word for such satanic characters,Our word masters of TPS should find some suitable word for such creatures that fit with their extreme dishonesty and incompetence as such.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Natasha</title>
		<link>http://www.pkhope.com/shameless/comment-page-1/#comment-802519</link>
		<dc:creator>Natasha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pakspectator.com/?p=17958#comment-802519</guid>
		<description>Shameless indeed.Not the country but the ruling elite.The country's paying for this shamelessness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shameless indeed.Not the country but the ruling elite.The country&#8217;s paying for this shamelessness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

