<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sane Reaction From Some US Congressmen on US Attacks in Pakistan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pkhope.com/sane-reaction-from-some-us-congressmen-on-us-attacks-in-pakistan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pkhope.com/sane-reaction-from-some-us-congressmen-on-us-attacks-in-pakistan/</link>
	<description>A Candid Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 19:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Wil Robinson</title>
		<link>http://www.pkhope.com/sane-reaction-from-some-us-congressmen-on-us-attacks-in-pakistan/comment-page-1/#comment-98666</link>
		<dc:creator>Wil Robinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 03:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pakspectator.com/sane-reaction-from-some-us-congressmen-on-us-attacks-in-pakistan/#comment-98666</guid>
		<description>The voices of dissent over the incursions into Pakistani territory are few and far between.  Unfortunately, both presidential candidates agree with the move - Obama more so than McCain.

It seems the August meeting between Zardari and U.S. UN Ambassador Khalilzad were designed specifically to line up support for these military maneuvers.  But such collusion could not be openly addressed, hence the U.S. State Dept's alleged "chastisement" of Khalilzad's communication with Zardari.

Answers?  I have none.  Do you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The voices of dissent over the incursions into Pakistani territory are few and far between.  Unfortunately, both presidential candidates agree with the move - Obama more so than McCain.</p>
<p>It seems the August meeting between Zardari and U.S. UN Ambassador Khalilzad were designed specifically to line up support for these military maneuvers.  But such collusion could not be openly addressed, hence the U.S. State Dept&#8217;s alleged &#8220;chastisement&#8221; of Khalilzad&#8217;s communication with Zardari.</p>
<p>Answers?  I have none.  Do you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

