Comments on: Safety in “Big Daddy’s” Shadow? http://www.pkhope.com/safety-in-%e2%80%9cbig-daddy%e2%80%99s%e2%80%9d-shadow/ A Candid Blog Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:29:44 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 By: Dave Q. http://www.pkhope.com/safety-in-%e2%80%9cbig-daddy%e2%80%99s%e2%80%9d-shadow/comment-page-1/#comment-94883 Dave Q. Tue, 09 Sep 2008 15:53:34 +0000 http://www.pakspectator.com/safety-in-%e2%80%9cbig-daddy%e2%80%99s%e2%80%9d-shadow/#comment-94883 I dig Sarah Palin. Despite the fact that I am curious to what color panties she is wearing while giving a speech, I do like most of her policies... :) I dig Sarah Palin. Despite the fact that I am curious to what color panties she is wearing while giving a speech, I do like most of her policies… :)

]]> By: Dan Tow http://www.pkhope.com/safety-in-%e2%80%9cbig-daddy%e2%80%99s%e2%80%9d-shadow/comment-page-1/#comment-94882 Dan Tow Tue, 09 Sep 2008 15:50:44 +0000 http://www.pakspectator.com/safety-in-%e2%80%9cbig-daddy%e2%80%99s%e2%80%9d-shadow/#comment-94882 Nick Clay, Did I *say* I didn't like fair elections? On the contrary, I would defend with my life the continuation of free and fair elections in America, and, yes, I realize that the result might not go to Obama, though I don't plan to give up just because it *might* not go my way. The most vital part of free and fair elections is the right to freely express our views on the candidates, whatever those views may be, which does not appear to be a right you support! Nick Clay,

Did I *say* I didn’t like fair elections? On the contrary, I would defend with my life the continuation of free and fair elections in America, and, yes, I realize that the result might not go to Obama, though I don’t plan to give up just because it *might* not go my way. The most vital part of free and fair elections is the right to freely express our views on the candidates, whatever those views may be, which does not appear to be a right you support!

]]> By: Happy Troll from Alaska http://www.pkhope.com/safety-in-%e2%80%9cbig-daddy%e2%80%99s%e2%80%9d-shadow/comment-page-1/#comment-94874 Happy Troll from Alaska Tue, 09 Sep 2008 15:23:24 +0000 http://www.pakspectator.com/safety-in-%e2%80%9cbig-daddy%e2%80%99s%e2%80%9d-shadow/#comment-94874 What we are witnessing here is proof that the Lord is looking after America and that prayers are heard and answered. This wonderful warrior was pulled to our rescue at the last moment to put us back on course in our quest to do His work. He was listening in to the prayers from His faithful in Alaska and brought out the best he has to bring it all to fruition. Not a moment too soon. Join us in our work to save those who can be saved. It's not too late, yet. God Bless Sarah Palin! What we are witnessing here is proof that the Lord is looking after America and that prayers are heard and answered.

This wonderful warrior was pulled to our rescue at the last moment to put us back on course in our quest to do His work. He was listening in to the prayers from His faithful in Alaska and brought out the best he has to bring it all to fruition. Not a moment too soon.

Join us in our work to save those who can be saved. It’s not too late, yet.

God Bless Sarah Palin!

]]> By: Nick Clay http://www.pkhope.com/safety-in-%e2%80%9cbig-daddy%e2%80%99s%e2%80%9d-shadow/comment-page-1/#comment-94872 Nick Clay Tue, 09 Sep 2008 15:22:03 +0000 http://www.pakspectator.com/safety-in-%e2%80%9cbig-daddy%e2%80%99s%e2%80%9d-shadow/#comment-94872 Leave the country if you don't like fair elections moron which would ultimately bring Experience as a winner.. That is not a democracy. Why do you hate democracy so much? Because you can't win without cheating. Hell with O'bama Leave the country if you don’t like fair elections moron which would ultimately bring Experience as a winner.. That is not a democracy. Why do you hate democracy so much? Because you can’t win without cheating. Hell with O’bama

]]> By: Ernie http://www.pkhope.com/safety-in-%e2%80%9cbig-daddy%e2%80%99s%e2%80%9d-shadow/comment-page-1/#comment-94871 Ernie Tue, 09 Sep 2008 15:20:20 +0000 http://www.pakspectator.com/safety-in-%e2%80%9cbig-daddy%e2%80%99s%e2%80%9d-shadow/#comment-94871 Truthfully, I am an Evangelical Christian and proud of it. But, I don't think my beliefs qualify me to be a politician., rather I think they virtually prohibit me from seeking political office. It is the old issue of serving two masters, i.e., the world or the Lord. In their prayer closets I believe a lot of other Christians, whether they are Evangelical or not, are struggling with the reconciliation of the politician who took the stage at the Republican convention and the "chrisitan" we are all taught to be. Truthfully, I am an Evangelical Christian and proud of it. But, I don’t think my beliefs qualify me to be a politician., rather I think they virtually prohibit me from seeking political office. It is the old issue of serving two masters, i.e., the world or the Lord.

In their prayer closets I believe a lot of other Christians, whether they are Evangelical or not, are struggling with the reconciliation of the politician who took the stage at the Republican convention and the “chrisitan” we are all taught to be.

]]> By: Dan Tow http://www.pkhope.com/safety-in-%e2%80%9cbig-daddy%e2%80%99s%e2%80%9d-shadow/comment-page-1/#comment-94849 Dan Tow Tue, 09 Sep 2008 14:58:00 +0000 http://www.pakspectator.com/safety-in-%e2%80%9cbig-daddy%e2%80%99s%e2%80%9d-shadow/#comment-94849 Ch Naeem Sidhu, Thank you for your kind remarks, and don't worry, I'm not touchy about my name. (Here at home, my last name is constantly mispronounced - others usually pronounce it as rhyming with "so", but it actually rhymes with "now.") Mr. Bhutto, You bring up an important point regarding the implicit doctrine of necessity behind American actions and assumptions. I tried fairly carefully neither to defend nor to deny that doctrine, actually, in my article and in my above comment. Instead I focused on the realities of dealing with probable actions under the American leadership alternatives, without regard to higher questions of moral ideals in a perfect world. In the real world, anyone looking to be elected US president who promised not to trample sovereign rights of any other country, *under any circumstances*, even given a chance to remove bin Laden with minimal "collateral damage" would *never*, *ever* stand a chance of being elected. I suspect the *same* would go for a similar scenario in any other democracy that was the victim of something on the scale of 9/11, but you might argue that point, if you disagree - do you? Actually, I've never properly addressed the important question of what is or should be legal in international law, and what morality ought to dictate there. I think it deserves a full article, so, inspired by your comment, I plan one in the future. Ch Naeem Sidhu, Thank you for your kind remarks, and don’t worry, I’m not touchy about my name. (Here at home, my last name is constantly mispronounced - others usually pronounce it as rhyming with “so”, but it actually rhymes with “now.”)

Mr. Bhutto,

You bring up an important point regarding the implicit doctrine of necessity behind American actions and assumptions. I tried fairly carefully neither to defend nor to deny that doctrine, actually, in my article and in my above comment. Instead I focused on the realities of dealing with probable actions under the American leadership alternatives, without regard to higher questions of moral ideals in a perfect world. In the real world, anyone looking to be elected US president who promised not to trample sovereign rights of any other country, *under any circumstances*, even given a chance to remove bin Laden with minimal “collateral damage” would *never*, *ever* stand a chance of being elected. I suspect the *same* would go for a similar scenario in any other democracy that was the victim of something on the scale of 9/11, but you might argue that point, if you disagree - do you? Actually, I’ve never properly addressed the important question of what is or should be legal in international law, and what morality ought to dictate there. I think it deserves a full article, so, inspired by your comment, I plan one in the future.

]]> By: Ch Naeem Sidhu http://www.pkhope.com/safety-in-%e2%80%9cbig-daddy%e2%80%99s%e2%80%9d-shadow/comment-page-1/#comment-94557 Ch Naeem Sidhu Tue, 09 Sep 2008 09:18:19 +0000 http://www.pakspectator.com/safety-in-%e2%80%9cbig-daddy%e2%80%99s%e2%80%9d-shadow/#comment-94557 Sorry! I mis-spelled your name....DAN....I typed it Don... Sorry! I mis-spelled your name….DAN….I typed it Don…

]]> By: Ch Naeem Sidhu http://www.pkhope.com/safety-in-%e2%80%9cbig-daddy%e2%80%99s%e2%80%9d-shadow/comment-page-1/#comment-94555 Ch Naeem Sidhu Tue, 09 Sep 2008 09:17:05 +0000 http://www.pakspectator.com/safety-in-%e2%80%9cbig-daddy%e2%80%99s%e2%80%9d-shadow/#comment-94555 Very good. Excellent piece of writing. Its appreciable the way Don narrates the complicated international affairs, mindset of the American electorate and behind-the-scene lobbying by the US politicians. Dear writers of TPS! We should learn from Mr. Don how nicely he makes his article, readable without being pompous in his sentence-making which he can do better than all of us (desis), being a native English man. Many of us just try to fetch unnecessary words in our articles with the aim in mind to "impress" the readers and end with perplexing the issue by confused way of presentation. The best piece of writing is that which is comprehendable to all and sundry. Very good. Excellent piece of writing. Its appreciable the way Don narrates the complicated international affairs, mindset of the American electorate and behind-the-scene lobbying by the US politicians.
Dear writers of TPS! We should learn from Mr. Don how nicely he makes his article, readable without being pompous in his sentence-making which he can do better than all of us (desis), being a native English man.
Many of us just try to fetch unnecessary words in our articles with the aim in mind to “impress” the readers and end with perplexing the issue by confused way of presentation. The best piece of writing is that which is comprehendable to all and sundry.

]]> By: Bhutto http://www.pkhope.com/safety-in-%e2%80%9cbig-daddy%e2%80%99s%e2%80%9d-shadow/comment-page-1/#comment-94493 Bhutto Tue, 09 Sep 2008 03:25:38 +0000 http://www.pakspectator.com/safety-in-%e2%80%9cbig-daddy%e2%80%99s%e2%80%9d-shadow/#comment-94493 Dan - On the basis of some *assumptions* are you not indirectly granting the right or advocating the doctrine of necessity that US could attack a small country at will. Would US dare doing that to India, China, or USSR. I understand your intent but it seems that you are giving up as well. Can someone tell me who killed Abraham Lincoln, JFK, MLK, RFK, ...... There is a much bigger problem here right in our own backyard Dan that needs to be addressed before we declare anyone else as a threat to world peace. Who is responsible for current economic crisis, sub-prime mortgage issue, energy crisis, and what not...Blessed be you Dan... Dan - On the basis of some *assumptions* are you not indirectly granting the right or advocating the doctrine of necessity that US could attack a small country at will. Would US dare doing that to India, China, or USSR. I understand your intent but it seems that you are giving up as well. Can someone tell me who killed Abraham Lincoln, JFK, MLK, RFK, …… There is a much bigger problem here right in our own backyard Dan that needs to be addressed before we declare anyone else as a threat to world peace. Who is responsible for current economic crisis, sub-prime mortgage issue, energy crisis, and what not…Blessed be you Dan…

]]> By: Bert http://www.pkhope.com/safety-in-%e2%80%9cbig-daddy%e2%80%99s%e2%80%9d-shadow/comment-page-1/#comment-94477 Bert Tue, 09 Sep 2008 00:45:57 +0000 http://www.pakspectator.com/safety-in-%e2%80%9cbig-daddy%e2%80%99s%e2%80%9d-shadow/#comment-94477 Atta dame, big daddy has showcased. Atta dame, big daddy has showcased.

]]>