<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Poor By Birth, Rich By Nature</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pkhope.com/poor-by-birth-rich-by-nature/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pkhope.com/poor-by-birth-rich-by-nature/</link>
	<description>A Candid Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 23:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: James Killian Spratt</title>
		<link>http://www.pkhope.com/poor-by-birth-rich-by-nature/comment-page-1/#comment-1320391</link>
		<dc:creator>James Killian Spratt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 00:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pakspectator.com/poor-by-birth-rich-by-nature/#comment-1320391</guid>
		<description>GOOD one, Mr. Bashir!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GOOD one, Mr. Bashir!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr Razahaider</title>
		<link>http://www.pkhope.com/poor-by-birth-rich-by-nature/comment-page-1/#comment-70551</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr Razahaider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:02:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pakspectator.com/poor-by-birth-rich-by-nature/#comment-70551</guid>
		<description>Very true! Yousuf zahoor sb! And very legitimate concept and idea.

“What is one person’s worthless object is another man’s prized possession”. 
Agreed! This is really a perception.

But sir don’t you think this discussion need a little more arguments to be tagged as registered slogan or axiom in the books of registration as accepted docus of intellect.

Please don not mind, and grant me permission to change your name from mehtab bashir to yousuf zahoor since according to this concept as you mentioned above (if I assimilate it as true perspective dictionary of unsolved myth), shall not bother you for a moment at least. 

You see bashir logically , in spite of all open horizons of acceptance and belief you would not be able to agree the change in name and still if there is an error of once as a life time opportunity ,change will utilized its within domain i.e transformation, alteration, replacement ,mutation, substitution ,denomination ,modification or any of such words that are utilized in the contest ,mode and method of switching over  as  new element of requisite identification known as  entity and recognition in terms of personality and behavior.

Dear logically this behavior in terms of perception is a mandatory requirement of a system, whether it is a person, palace, or horizon. 

Demarcation of entity in terms of name as person, countries as nation, and people as community and premises as places are the essential requirement of system and organization indicating a rationalized, well groomed and organize society.

Under the umbrella of such suites privacy is maintained so to develop the concept of belief and respect in terms of obligation, rules and regulation and premises.

Such obligatory requirements are never based on perspective applications of vision and thoughts but perception based on actual reality which is the real reign of perception.

Perception is an integrated phenomenon of human behavior which provides information by conclusive calculations of assessment, evaluation, interpretation, inference, prediction and conclusion based methodology of coordinated, organized, reality based prediction, defining the information, though not in terms of statistical analysis, but legitimate essence of required criteria for reaction.
Since the phenomenon is based on subjective feel as perception it is always taken in lieu of reality.

Now as per discussion in the contest of litigation and controversy, since perception has defined and detailed mode and passage of interpretation in every individual as essential element of perceiving object and horizon, resultant of feel should not be the subject of discussion as, (what is felt as hot will be felt as hot, by every individual and similarly cold as cold).

 However if we start perceiving things in abnormal response, it is always a misnomer and a topic that required attention reflecting a disease as in (diabetes mellitus) and is logically unaccepted.

Dear nature has defined the theme in its own form and format of instinct tendencies. 

Every thing has its own horizon and sphere explaining restrictions as separate entity.

Humans differentiated from animals and plant and vice versa.

 Living from non livings, subjects from objects, similarly in behaviors, pattern, practices, culture, caste color, cadre, country, and as many as you wish.

Similarly boundaries domains restrictions, obligations requisition, designing are all mandatory essentials of human behavior.

Perception under horizon of such scattered and vast phenomena of nature relies on the theory of assessment and evaluation without exposing the basic of its object to feel by touch as interaction.

 Definition of existence in the contest of, contour, texture and composition by only mode as visualization, is known as visual perception ,which can not be perceived as reality since mirage in desert are the representation of same theme of fake reality as perception regards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very true! Yousuf zahoor sb! And very legitimate concept and idea.</p>
<p>“What is one person’s worthless object is another man’s prized possession”.<br />
Agreed! This is really a perception.</p>
<p>But sir don’t you think this discussion need a little more arguments to be tagged as registered slogan or axiom in the books of registration as accepted docus of intellect.</p>
<p>Please don not mind, and grant me permission to change your name from mehtab bashir to yousuf zahoor since according to this concept as you mentioned above (if I assimilate it as true perspective dictionary of unsolved myth), shall not bother you for a moment at least. </p>
<p>You see bashir logically , in spite of all open horizons of acceptance and belief you would not be able to agree the change in name and still if there is an error of once as a life time opportunity ,change will utilized its within domain i.e transformation, alteration, replacement ,mutation, substitution ,denomination ,modification or any of such words that are utilized in the contest ,mode and method of switching over  as  new element of requisite identification known as  entity and recognition in terms of personality and behavior.</p>
<p>Dear logically this behavior in terms of perception is a mandatory requirement of a system, whether it is a person, palace, or horizon. </p>
<p>Demarcation of entity in terms of name as person, countries as nation, and people as community and premises as places are the essential requirement of system and organization indicating a rationalized, well groomed and organize society.</p>
<p>Under the umbrella of such suites privacy is maintained so to develop the concept of belief and respect in terms of obligation, rules and regulation and premises.</p>
<p>Such obligatory requirements are never based on perspective applications of vision and thoughts but perception based on actual reality which is the real reign of perception.</p>
<p>Perception is an integrated phenomenon of human behavior which provides information by conclusive calculations of assessment, evaluation, interpretation, inference, prediction and conclusion based methodology of coordinated, organized, reality based prediction, defining the information, though not in terms of statistical analysis, but legitimate essence of required criteria for reaction.<br />
Since the phenomenon is based on subjective feel as perception it is always taken in lieu of reality.</p>
<p>Now as per discussion in the contest of litigation and controversy, since perception has defined and detailed mode and passage of interpretation in every individual as essential element of perceiving object and horizon, resultant of feel should not be the subject of discussion as, (what is felt as hot will be felt as hot, by every individual and similarly cold as cold).</p>
<p> However if we start perceiving things in abnormal response, it is always a misnomer and a topic that required attention reflecting a disease as in (diabetes mellitus) and is logically unaccepted.</p>
<p>Dear nature has defined the theme in its own form and format of instinct tendencies. </p>
<p>Every thing has its own horizon and sphere explaining restrictions as separate entity.</p>
<p>Humans differentiated from animals and plant and vice versa.</p>
<p> Living from non livings, subjects from objects, similarly in behaviors, pattern, practices, culture, caste color, cadre, country, and as many as you wish.</p>
<p>Similarly boundaries domains restrictions, obligations requisition, designing are all mandatory essentials of human behavior.</p>
<p>Perception under horizon of such scattered and vast phenomena of nature relies on the theory of assessment and evaluation without exposing the basic of its object to feel by touch as interaction.</p>
<p> Definition of existence in the contest of, contour, texture and composition by only mode as visualization, is known as visual perception ,which can not be perceived as reality since mirage in desert are the representation of same theme of fake reality as perception regards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

