There is lot of difference between Shoukat Aziz and Shaukat Tareen. Shaoukat tareen has proved himself by reviving few banks and sick units. Union Bank was built on his vision and being a customer of Union bank and Citi Bank…. I least found any big difference in services of both. Union bank was Pakistani bank but it was competing with Citi Bank… and selling it at 4 times of its book valus is proof of it.

Now come toward borrowings… What Pakistan have to export??? If you don’t have exports then even small borrowings can take country in hell. Trade deficit is increasing and increasing and it can’t stop because Pakistan is second MADE IN CHINA.

One man can do nothing… if all leaders and people sitting on higher positions are least worried about future. I think, Shoukat Tareen took a big risk by accepting this position. his past record is good and this will change his goodwill to badwill.

I have no problem with this guy. Worst is already done so he has nothing else to else… I hope some thing good will be done…if government will take initiatives, as he will suggest.

I personally know one professional… who is economist, qualified from Harvard University and Pakistani. He has big contribution in making economic policies of Kazikistan and they praise that guy. Shoukat Aziz requested him to join his team and do some thing for his own country. he spent 2 years and in last he gave resing and went back. he said me that Saleem, iss mUlk ka khuda he hafiz hai… Yeh loog iss ko nahi chalnay dain gay. But he said that Shoukat Aziz is not as bad as projected. He discussed many things about govt policies and criticized that no body really want change here…they only speak but do nothing.

Anyway I can just pray and can contribute as per my power in the growth of country. Allah Bless Pakistan.