But why do we need this strategy when the pending threat already landed within the premises of the boundary.

Why not this elite consensual unanimous expected declaration became our standing operative procedure as state, which does not require declaration from those who are themselves unaware of real ground and factual information, as reality in terms of present past and future up comings?

Brigadier Sahib! We can not, being army officer carry away with the theme of responsibility by expressing our restrains of action.

We have by design granted the prerogative and authoritative responsibility to ask before any one every such knocking elements to identify and prove identity, hence to liquidate the info to the in-house responsible whether he be allowed or be disembark.

This is a routine concept of watchman.

I am unable to understand the concept of seeking permission whether we should disembark the individual or should allow in performing activity.

Brigadier sahib! I would personally not blame USA for its intention and policies and bla bla.

In my opinion, a problem lies at our level.

Brigadier sahib administrative eyes as vigilance and monitoring are the key requirement of any state functionaries.

It is this aspect of intellect that forecast intended move, activate precautionary measures, lashes out flaws and meanly secure the attachments as prerequisite and No sacrifice ifs and buts, in the shape of belongings thereby dictating prior to indulgence that at the end of the day, we will not be under any dominant rule or legislative blame.

In addition there is also a feeling and expression of impression as mandatory slogan that sharing of responsibility will not be the ultimate obligation in any format mode or means.

Such prior set are known as terms and condition.

Brigadier sahib astonishingly or perhaps by virtue of our fate same terms and condition on our priority or preference never became our fate and were infact forced to accomplished the same without pondering any say.

This was because incapability in terms of appointment and designation always remained our desired crown.

Ultimately, similar eventful episode of fate that is now to be brunt by the nation.

Brigadier sahib! Some body needs to accept, the fault and faulty turn.

What happen or happening in Fata and vicinity is by no means an issue which can easily be neglected as, how come these menace turned in to such a forceful thrust occupying the territorial jurisdiction without any meaning full retaliation by government functionaries until the day it was exploded as occupied.

Some body need to take responsibility as negligence or otherwise can not keep away from deliberate contribution.

My point is simple I being an army officer consider myself liable to answer the nation as populace and my country and under ceremonial oath as obligatory affirmation only rely on my best of abilities to safeguard the integrity and sovereignty at the cost of my life whereas similar working to enhance the issue on diplomatic ground is the responsibility of the governance.