other than that ………just one more “artical” for tamasha.

to increase Indian web traffic.

NO. not at all. Now that you know, you can go back to sleep. At least then, you would not be inflicting the readers with the kind of drivel you’ve posted here.

The Maoist attack on police force has made the government to call them militants and terrorists. A proper military operation was held against them. and the area that they were controlling and understood as their strong hold has been destroyed.

I hope your author of this article is aware of this, otherwise please enlighten him with this, as it appears to be asleep.

dawn January 11, 2009 Sunday
By Ardeshir Cowasjee

The Mumbai incident will haunt this country for long, as has the attack upon the Indian parliament earlier this century. In the vocal and verbal dangerous skirmishes indulged in by India and Pakistan since November it has transpired, and it has been admitted by Pakistan, and the world knows that the Lashkar-i-Taiba were the planners and perpetrators. Now who and what are the Lashkar? They are members of a group formed by Pakistan’s ISI to wage the Kashmir freedom fight. This is admitted and recorded. So it would not be illogical to assume that if it be the Lashkar who undertook the Mumbai operation then the members concerned could conceivably have originated in Pakistan.

Upright cavalry officer, National Security Advisor Mehmud Durrani, on Jan 7, as outspoken as ever, shot from the hip and admitted to CNN-IBN, the Indian-based subsidiary of CNN, that the lone surviving gunman from the Mumbai terrorist attacks, Mohammad Ajmal Kasab, was in fact a national of Pakistan. He was followed in line by “a senior government official”, a “spokesman” of the Foreign Office, and none less than the minister of information who, in the position she holds, presumably does have the correct information to hand, all admitting that yes, Kasab, was indeed a Pakistani. The Foreign Office person added to the confirmation of Kasab’s nationality the news that he would not be accorded any consular help — how can a national of Pakistan, non-state actor or not, be denied consular help if it is sought?

The reaction was almost immediate. Durrani was ‘sacked’ by the prime minister — not merely relieved of his post — and accused of having “tarnished” the national image (which is already in need of a good scrub and buff) and of having indulged in “irresponsible behaviour”. None of the others who had been equally outspoken in confirmation of Durrani’s statement were touched — whether they were privately reprimanded or not is not known. But we have not heard that they have been turfed out.

According to Durrani, the man to whom he officially reported, Gilani, “was unhappy that I made the statement without consulting him”. According to reports in the US press, Durrani was fired for “failing to take Mr Gilani and other stakeholders into confidence and for lack of coordination on matters of national security”.

What a bizarre turn of events, which has but brought more damage to Pakistan’s waning image. According to friend Ayaz Amir, writing in the Khaleej Times on Friday, he has it on “good authority” that Zardari called Durrani and apologised to him on the matter of his dismissal. Now we wait and see how Durrani’s Washington pals react — if at all.

Maoists mostly target policemen and CRPF jawans.

They normally DONOT kill innocent civilians EXCEPT certain political workers from certain parties.

HHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA………..Great joke