The Pakistani Spectator

Results do not wait for happening.

Actions though are single acts but have duet expression in terms of acts, as action and sometimes like reaction or retaliation.

This is time to dig and execute action, whether it is perceived in terms of action or reaction.

Here! Lies, the problem, we are still wondering to dig the intentions.

If the enemy is here with motive and plan, which shall only culminate at execution and exercise, which insane would let complete the task to fulfill the desire, so to establish writ in FATA or else.

What has been made destined by fate can only revert by sacrifice, belief and faith.

What is this concept of sophisticated, powerful, huge army waiting for humiliation?

What more can be done to an individual who is willfully and willingly acted to come to the battle field with the only option of survival.

I always try to keep discussion beyond and away from religious bindings as any body attending the battle have same slogan of faith according to his bearings.

In my opinion, as per my belongings and attachments, I have reservoirs of such insignias and symbols, that are enough to be an ethical, logical and real reason to attend such critical issues of dire need, if at all, required by the nation.

This is the same ethical principality as Islam or any religion preaches which popularly in terms of Islam, known as jihad.

Now swiftly turning the discussion back to the theme of the article and present version of thoughts, I have no second thought but to remember again speech of Zulfiqar ali Bhutto in united nation.

Without going in to controversy of discussion neither would expect the same on the run of discussion, I consider those words as requirement of the time that can definitely be perceived by the enemy who ever he may be.

“The security council has acted short sightedly by acquiescing to the dilatory tactics”.

“You know! You have come to a point when we will say’

“Do what you like”.

“If before you have come to this point we could have made a commitment.”

“We could have said, all right! We are prepared to do something”.

Now! “Why should we”?

“You want to silence us by guns”?

“Silence our voice by arms”?

“So why should we say we are agreeing to any thing”?

“Now you decide what you like”.

“Your decision will not be a binding on us”.

“You can decide what you like”.

“You can do because, if you had left us a margin of hope, we might have been a party to some settlement”.

“I find it disgraceful to my person and to my country to remain here a moment longer than necessary”.

“But I am not boycotting”.

Impose!!! Impose! “Any decision”

“Have a treaty more than treaty of Versailles”

“Legalize aggression”

“Legalize occupation”

“Legalize every thing that has been illegal

“I will not be a party to it”

“We will fight; we will go back and fight”

“My country beckons for me”

“Why should I waste my time herein the security council”

My point is simple, why should I recall the memory and consult book so to express something as unique abstract on the philosophical input of speech, of some noble price holder, to varnish and garnish my comment as float, when we have wonderful well acted speech as precious event full episode of the past.

What is this security council and united nation ,if they can not hold the deliberate, intended move of someone at someplace ,that by law of ethics restricts by all means, ,thereby to dictate as acceptance in terms of sovereignty and integrity, as legal binding in international law.

Is it this council been made to fulfill the desire as lust of nation as superpower or is it like that they are there to endorse or legalize all acts of illegitimate desire as subject of principality ,as charter of duty.

Under what prerogative and obligation we should respect the dominant role of this organization when they have nothing to say on the issue of aggression in our premises.

Why don’t we let it go the way that is within our premises of achievement?

In my opinion any thing that is and that can be accomplished so to embarrass, from boycotting united nation to recalling of our ambassadors and similarly from supply route extermination to reflection as war like expression, is and shall be the strategy.

However every such mode and method should be sorted as preferred point so to reassemble the position as ultimate pending war.

We repeat as nation that we do not own or shelter these Taliban, neither have we granted clemency to them who have made us put under such compromising setback.

Although, we do not want this war to become our part and parcel by any means, but still if it is the fate of imposing act, we should remain under active war like position and environment.

As to the ultimate resultant outcome of this behavior, we should not care as what else can be done or be retired on us other than to become abolish or destroyed.

Let the world know that joint effort of many activist of human right slogan, reacted together to demolish and destroy a single friendly partner without justified reason.

Let history be made that once there were people of nature who confronted the superpower with sticks in hand.

Let the historian criticize the event with the name of aggressor so to malign continuously for their act which could not become the fate of other nation again after our sacrifice.

Stand up, prepare nation, prove your identity caste, cadre, belongings, bearings, attachment and above all unity, faith and discipline.

Pakistan Zinda baad Paindabaad

Trackback URL