The Pakistani Spectator

An action is an arbitrarily activity that culminates in to ultimate outcome as, result.

Result is a term that is used rationally in the contest of consequences and outcome.

Under the define premise of action and results, intention plays the pivotal role.

Any action for effect oriented culminations as resultant requires, essential attachment as approach, which is dependent on intended desire.

If we trackback result or resultant, quantitative assessment of actions can be assessed and similarly tracking and running along the action ultimate resultant can be ascertain.

Action and resultant are such parameter that delineates potential capability of individual candidates.

Half hearted actions have preoccupied conditional reservation.

It may be a dictation or a deliberate withholds to achieve goal or result, whole heatedly or to achieve results partially and thus always affect result oriented solution.

Similarly, pre-dictated theme, deviate consequential resultant thus litigate and puzzle results in the eyes of examinee as spectators, since expected or likely result does not qualify a known predicted outcome as result, hence ends in astonishment and query with reservation as fake, forge , dodged or deceived.

Half hearted actions with choosy selection of targets have same catastrophe as surprise.

Here again, predefined restrictions, dictated theme and specific selectivity as chose, curtails results as ultimate calculated or eventual resultant, which shall and is supposed to be, the likely result.

It is a customary practice that execution of action on target does not need prior permission and if at all such permission to topple targets becomes preliminary essentiality, similar unachievable results as surprise again become the fate in terms of satisfaction.

A soldier during war and a surgeon in theatre have prerogative to take decision at his own and as per depending situation.

Once some one has authorized some one and had uploaded with battle requirement, the only point left is accomplishment of mission at own and returns.

However continuous unachieved target, with increase in spam of awarded or accepted time that shall ideally be required, litigates action in the contextual term as perhaps failed, futile or unsuccessful action, which may be due to qualification deficit or deliberate deceive.

Similarly concept to move one self as per dictated theme of policy maker sitting outside does not qualify in terms of achievement during action and thus almost always derange the end resultant.

It is a difficult task, logically, to figure battle on paper field without putting foot in battle.

However after going through current and past scenes of agitation it seems clearly that there is some hinder factor which is restraining complete fulfillment of mission and deliberate negligence seems to be in position as SOP.

This is with reference to SWAT especially…………………………

If I recall my previous military service we have seen amazing hilly stations, more aggressive in terms of fire and subversive Indian activity but astonishingly such failure to displace culprit, is beyond imagination, as it is in swat and else.

Astonishingly military presence has miraculous reversion of peace and law and order but once again, it is deficient here in this area.

Why is it so, that is still a subject as myth; though we being ex-service man are familiar with the issue and theme as it still remains our subject during and in our discussion around colleagues.

Many have rightly pointed out that this is time to pay attention and rectify and sort our priorities, preferences, and obligations.

Delays never match desired results as intended and vital.

The most illogical point that snaps and shutter resolution of law and order is normally floated with reference to the threshold of activity of these terrorist as militant.

Here it is to be pointed out that wrong utilization of sanctified verb, the militants has no place in the dictionary of activities in SWAT or else as what is being done or in run, is an act of brutality and massacre.

A militant is a term that is used in the contest of Islamic principality of Jihad against aggressors and enemies, through the logical platform of mandatory slogan of JIHAD.

Up till now it is as clear as truth that the composite actions in conductivity are the typical acts of subversions recipes as practiced and prescribed by Indian RAW.

Bridges, schools, shelters, offices, resorts and pumps and any thing that may distort economy and move and reversion to peace, are almost destroyed.

How does it happened and in progress, it’s still a matter of speculation at large but scrutiny demands; if we as trained professionals, have entered Swat and vicinity around what’s the point of failure to restrain and revert peace process, if at all full efforts are in run?

I think crucifying the same question can delineate line action and culprit hindering the memo would be isolated and captured.

Many have speculated multiple political blacklisted figures behind the role as, what enemy desire.

If some one at someplace is sleeping with the enemy what’s the point of sparing the two?

In my opinion, this political goony factor, if at all have weightage, has no worthy importance as exposed intentions have less reflections in terms of affected result.

Provision and prosecution of the concept of rehabilitation as modernization is again the chapter of controversy making it an important gadget toward resolution of peace.

In my opinion modern gadgets, and suggested schools and modernization could not benefit to reverse our swat and its peace.

Infact such activity of provision is a post scenario theme and is applicable only after peace process and return of living activity.

Currently! A very unethical and illogical theme, as solution, of this continuous uproar of FATA and else has taken the point of discussion at all level of journalism and populace at large.

Though suggestion on the issue have many abstract as credible slogans but element of disregard rejects these notions of solution and thus more impact of displacement and rejection of such ideas is carried out on the logic of visit of the area before floating of ideas; since in their opinion terror that has taken the area can not be perceived by sitting outside the lawn and sipping coffee.

In my opinion, it’s not necessary that one should head a convoy to report and repulse act of terror as idea and notion after factual visit of the place of massacre.

The term terror and terrorism is a very well understandable and explainable term, if we can read the after effects as resultant, since actions have explainable theme of devastation as resultant.

The terms do not need meaningful action by sighting it like regular moon.

Similarly writ of the state has no place as far as selection and sorting of target as achievement is concerned since implementation of writ is a gross attitude and any one standing against the tide are engaged in the contest of hindrances.

Logic itself explains the event.

I am astonished though people like anchors and many others inspite of decades of experiences and span as tenure in journalism are still unable to highlight the root cause of this anarchical turmoil

Responsible behavior starts from the floating of idea that has rational and ethical usage of terms and tenure with scrutiny of priorities, preferences and obligations hence keeping the eye on pitfalls and environmental hazards that may blush and peel the individual more than the threat.

When you intend to solve the solution logic demand approach that may crucify real from fake and similarly, required criterion of scrutiny from date of birth to wed lock with memoir of first mating that resulted in the faulty birth; since present transformation of these terrorist must have some initial relevance of origin and In my opinion extreme of activity has insurance from guardian or parent or masters that are strong enough to snatch and release their habitant from the wrath of law.

A similar illogical view of the birth of this terrorism in the face of Taliban has been tagged with the abolishment of qazi court that was once with in the dominant rule as governance.

What is this concept of qazi courts within the constitutional domain of already declared rule of law and system of governance, when award and reward of authoritative punishment as legislation is already the rule of engagement?

It was never like that few criminals were dormant before demolishment of the Qazi courts and thereafter a vast field was provided to them so to move around and play the game of desire.

Another school of experts misdirect calculation toward political solution to the misery.

Concealed reservation if at all directs thoughts towards the portfolio of derange suggestion which some one not related to the issue can very well assess as wrong approach because such deviated suggestions have a clear outlook of vendetta based restricted ideology.

Capacity and capabilities have numerical based ascending or descending criteria.

It is never like, that we use the hardest impact first and lighter impact thereafter.

Though at times, circumstantial vice move do versa, the situational requirement.

What is not under control within the rigid confiscated seal of army can not be handle by the goons of politics.

People must understand the foremost step is the writ of law of state and thereafter every such factor that becomes necessity, May it is qazi court or restructuring and reforms of the region.

It is clear from current suggested themes that none are aware or probably concealing factual figure to delineate actual requirement of army and failure of the state machinery as police or LEA(Law enforcing agency) or provincial constitutional administration.

Currently a legendary anchor expressed the notion as verdict that schools and such places are being attacked for reason of being under usage of arm forces.

I must suggest, champions should familiarize themselves with the move of arm forces and their deployment around vicinity.

These schools and place of ghost, like unattended DHQ’s and installation are normally under the use of services as paraphernalia’s engaged to provide medical cum ration facilities and not operational force.

It is this targeting of theses terrorist that is the main point of engagement since services has the role of immense importance so to manage stay of the convoy as well as local populace in terms of medical provision.

As to the query that perhaps this action as stay is the root cause of engagement and destructions of school building, it’s a misnomer and one should again familiarize himself that the act in relation to conductivity is a hallmark of such forces as RAW which are planting cultivation along with supportive supplies to the terrorist.

It is this point where need of army is an essentiality which can not be managed by LEA, civil administration or police.

Let me ask a general question what may be the problem of the locality in terms of failure of writ?

Here it is to be noted that people at general populace have a perception that perhaps its locals who have revolted against the concept of principality of the state as bigotry?

I think here the point need to be clarified with reference to the misconception of the conceptual slogan of terrorist and militancy, since the domain and demarcation of phrases as verbs have the point of legitimate bearing in terms of faith, citizenship and conduct.

Either it is terrorism or legitimate militancy from the Islamic perspective which in my opinion has no reflection of image even.

Here it is to be pointed out that wrong utilization of sanctified verb, the militants has no place in the dictionary of activities in SWAT or else as what is being done or in run, is not an act of bigotry but brutal massacre.

A militant is a term that is used tin the contest of Islamic principality of Jihad against aggressors and enemies through the logical platform of mandatory slogan as JIHAD.

As long as this term is differentiated and propelled in a manner of its right usage derangement to the contest of curtailment and writ would continue to perish, since unrelated factors that hinder the action as retaliation will always shutter the thrust to loose the grip.

Now if we securely move the term terrorism from the sanctified term of militancy next station ahead directs the action to be taken as per devastation and quality of engagement as destruction.

It is not like that some people at some place got angry on the issue and they moved to mountains so to define a state within state for their deprivation but it’s an open war between penetrating roots of Indian tentacles within the domain of Pakistani premise as an act of subversive and dismantling proverb.

Inquisitiveness to dialogue the enemy is again under the rule of ethics as compulsion by some insane commentators as anchors and journalist.

We dialogue enemy to avoid conflict when enemy as rivals are in their respective domains.

Once breach to the contest of severity has lashed your premise, no dialogue whatsoever is mandatory and rational.

Here at this point , one ethical and compulsive question by populace do litigate issue with extreme of controversy as reservation, this is with its full weightage inconceivable that, when media can breach the door to show most wanted and their confess verdict publically, why government shows inability to cordon such vandals.

This is the point of distinction that really needs to be scrutinized and demarcated.

Here is the essence of failure where these so called Islamic clerics are pishing the scam as militancy and journalism is seconding the concept by gesturing to follow dialogue and calling militancy at their end.

My point is simple, our media have altogether pasted the conceptual term militancy over the terrorism and infact have benefitted the terrorism to hide behind the term.

Appreciate our forces who inspite of hindrance to abstain from the premise of FATA and else deliberately moved there so to confiscate the domain from further influx of Indian intentions that were actually the execution of the trade mark of tehrik-e-Taliban or similar terrorist or the master above.

In my opinion; only loyal approach to disregard all such element as political goon can assemble the dismantling region.

Here it is to be pointed out that few mongers in Baluchistan are similarly working on same principles with master spy RAW;

Simply engaging them, with hard hand and escorting their activities, things would automatically enter the control zone.

Trackback URL