Do Taliban represent True Islam or not? Why can’t we prosecute them under Blasphemy law?
By Dr RazaHaider • May 1st, 2009 • Category: Politics • 8 CommentsIt has been observed by many, rather more; as controversy that if; Taliban do not represent true Islamic picture as practice; why this prerogative as grant to consider Taliban as Muslim is still, within the concept of Islamic militants.
In other words if Islam has been macerated by their deliberate distortion; what factors are there that curtails their trial under the rule of blasphemy?
Once such debate became the part of inquisition on one of my article; by a person not with in the belief of Islam hence deliberated me to rectify his query.
Taliban’s do not represent Islam.
They claim their acts as Islamic.
Representation by definition explains authoritative grant of power of attorney where representative’s acts are representation of the authority for which these acts are carried out.
Since there is no such authoritative dispensing as grant hence under no means their or even my acts may be tagged as unanimous representation or symbol
Infact it’s again a claim.
There is a great difference between the two terms representation and claim, as phrase.
Representation expresses itself as right of demonstration whereas claim alleges representation as right.
I suppose I may not and shall not; route further explanation to these terms since, they are up to the level of theme understandable.
To the uttermost extent as discussion and to further elaborate my theme as explanation; I am of the opinion that differences of interpretation of the holy book and Sunnah especially towards practices and thereof its ultimate implications and further implementation, has resulted in to this controversy of right and righteous or representation as claim.
In my opinion it’s a difficult position and can not be under stood, but with a logic.
When you say you are a Christian, Hindu or a Muslim, it eventually explains practices and belief since, there are; a laid down procedural conviction or modes being a follower, once one is under the faith as principle of belief of that religion.
This belief as conviction under the rule of follower is always taken as baseline or fence of religion; thereby rejecting all concepts other than but the one; that is being sworn as belief.
A Muslim is declared Muslim when he accepts monotheistic concept as God (Same as in Christianity and Judaism) and a similar essential belief as declaration of (Muhammad SAWAW) as last prophet.
This is the basic conceptual symbol as obligation of Islam as essential belief and prerequisite, under the rule of religion being a Muslim.
By expressing these two obligatory principles as unanimous symbols, I have deliberately cordoned the discussion by unplugging variant contra lateral argument therefore to keep unanimously approved slogan with in the concept of belief as essentiality, in variant sects.
From here rules of practices have defined and declared visionary concepts of perception as interpretation.
Human by nature have ability and instinct to evaluate surrounds and around as per rule of interpretation.
This may be an observation, assumptions, prediction, inference, evaluation, experiments hence, invent as discovery, by any available means of interpretation putting it within the interpreted thought as version, postulates and theory.
This concept relies and ultimately procures law thus easing their way and consoling mind as future practice.
This rule of interpretation and its preliminary numerical steps applies where rules are laid down for future.
But if this theory as law is already a declared phenomenon as truth; in the format of open vocabularies concept as book (May it be bible or Qoran) and similar concept of practical version and virtual image of the book as prophet Mohammed (SAWAW), which is called Sunnah in Islam; logic demand and direct open discussion.
Open field as declared laws under such rules of logic; though remains the same but the rule of take as understanding, evaluation and therefore interpretation depends upon their own sources of obligations and indulgent as long as basic rules of book remains the same.
It is this point of debate where interpretation differs among the follower.
Why is it so; you may call it an innate human tendency which always directs thought towards motivated desire to perceive things as per their interpretation.
This mode of interpretation always heightens when ever mind gets chance of open field free from obligation and compulsion of laid criteria.
It is here where understanding derives its essence as practice from grounds that are put as backups, grooming, tendencies, abilities and every such factor that may be dominant among the perceiver.
This perception and reception therefore to deduce as interpret can not be cordoned or confiscated or trialed, if rules of law has an extracted interpreted version as far as one keeps basic belief as legitimate.
Under the ethics of dictionary; procured idea of individual in terms of interpretation can not be tagged or put as representation hence symbol.
A Muslim is a representative of Islam.
A practitioner and follower by law, is suppose to follow rule.
A student reflects his grooming by exhibiting behavior hence representing his school, home and teacher.
Numerically declared as first represent his class similarly class representing or standing first represents school among schools.
This is a general formula of logic.
Any person abrogating laid down law as rule is considered as traitor
Principle of belief and similar criterion based representation and reflections, if at all are breached; violate ethical laws of corporate, organization, states or religion hence putting individual in terms of explanation for violation.
Where as restricted, compulsive, obligatory rules as authority, that are put as prerequisite laws as compulsion; are the basis of any unit as governance and therefore defaulters are treated as violators hence out right termination.
As such if Muslims are under the wrong or derange behavior or expressing wrongful representation as picture they must and should be put as traitor hence outright expelled as violators.
“Either you are Muslim as obligatory follower or you are out of Islam”
Follower means one who follows.
We being “Muslim must pay attention to this word ‘follower’”.
As far as blasphemy and similar rules as law should be applied to these Taliban; it is again a subject that demands logical crossover which resides on belief of the two basic laws for being a Muslim.
Since these Taliban are within the declared acceptance of belief as prerequisite which necessitate being Muslim; they are being spared.
Though! My personal view is any one violating the true image of this basic assumption as law; should be liable and trialed since ‘its not just rules as law that is to be followed but; practices remains the image of real picture’.
One more thing that needs to be understood is the punishment as jurisprudence in Islamic perspective.
Without controversially litigating shariah as law or jurisprudence under principle of belief of Islam; there should be one general understanding for all; May it be Muslim or otherwise that; ‘all laws and their punishment in Islam, as been laid down as criterion; is a definite part of acceptance but prosecution under such acts is again a necessary part of religion.’
Under this belief awarder and awardee have prerequisites that must fulfill as compulsion before dispensing punishment in its real format.
It is not like that any dick, Harry, and wijhay or salaam would stand and award punishment without fulfilling strict criteria of such awards.
This is a similar obligation as prerequisite of Islam and in my opinion Taliban’s have distorted this image of Islam by setting it aside or breaching the real path of truth as compulsory obligation therefore exploiting real picture of Islam.
This criterion to dispense punishment in real theme of format has strict compliance as pious, obedience and truthful practitioner and under the protocol of prerogatives as Islamic state based on scholastic attitude of clerical acceptance as scholar; which these Taliban’s are not even up to the mark or entry qualifier.
In my opinion sanctioned punishments as Islamic laws indicate severity of crime with respect to intensity of penalty.
Punishments are mode to herald crime and intensity of punishment reflects graveness of the issue.
Murder is an offence that awards death penalty if proven though, legislations and implementations in different countries and religion have different protocols as practice depending upon their rules as laws.
Under the rule, every acts of Taliban are against the concept of Islamic law and practice since they do not comply or imply basics and compulsive obligatory essentials of prerequisite.
But since they are within the basic belief as Muslim they can not be trialed under rule of general consensus among few sects of Islam.
I repeat few sects of Islam
Though in my personal opinion! I disregard and discard their practice and attitude; endorsing it as, against Islam and Islamic concept of peace and humble treat and hence ready to treat them under the rule of yen as blasphemy.
Trackback URL
|
|
|
Click For More Articles By Dr RazaHaider
All posts by Dr RazaHaider
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Dear Mr.Razahaider ,
After having gone through your atricle, one should anticipate that this is just a differentiation of views which different people may possess regarding any evaluation, made by any person , as you aforesaid called the act of Taliban as a “misfeasance”.
one must have knowledge that the saying of Allah & Hazrat Muhammad ( PBUH) should also be taken into view before deciding about any act to be fair or unfair , as Allah pak said ,( Meanings being quoted) that ” Agar tum Amar bil marouf aur nahi unil munkir ko choor bethogay to Allah pak tum pay aisay Zalim badshah ( Leader ) ko musallat kar dega jo tumharay baroon ka adab nahi karay ga aur chooton pay shafqat nahi karay ga , us waqt tum madad chahoo gay to nahi milay ge ”
that is the thing, that we muslims are begging in front of others & having no one to help us at this moment & continously begging, instead of asking the same from Allah to help muslims & to act on what is to be acted on by us, as being muslim,( that is to make our rules consistent with sharia )
What was done in the Lal Masjid with those 1000s of students, who were taking the sharia Education but were carnaged so badly , that was & is our leader currently.
This is just due to our AAMAL , which must be better if one want the situation to be better,
Talibans ( which means ” ILM ka Talib” ) are quite right by doing these acts and to impose sharia rules in such a way, Also note that those cases which were lying unsolved for the preceding 30 years in Sawat, have just been solved in favourable manner according to Islamic rules.
We must pray at this moment to Allah to make the situation favourable & to wipe off the western ethnical & in this regard if Talibans are taking steps to do so then it is the help from Allah pak , who is implementing the rules of Sharia through the Talibans .
Best Regards
Faisal Javaid
ACMA , ACA
Faisal Javaid,
You offer a very disturbing proposal to deal with so called “existential problems” that are hard to ignore in the climate of the day. It’s exactly the concern that you display that poses an immenant threat to our collective mindset.
“note that those cases which were lying unsolved for the preceding 30 years in Sawat, have just been solved in favourable manner according to Islamic rules.”
Favorable to who?? “Maulana” Fazal-ul-Haq or Sufi Shah or bloodthirsty mentality that you seem to propound. Even if a theocratic model for governance is to be considered for Pakistan, who gets to immplent this model. You suggest let Taliban carry on with the ideal policy. Talbani rhetoric has already labeled Pakistani constition as unIslamic. They refuse to recognize it. In any book that would be seen as mutiny.
By placing your chips on the Talibani factor are you siding with traitors? Jinnah’s Pakistan has been molded into whatever shape by successive governments but all can agree it wasn’t a theocracy.
All manner of prayer and wish-fulfilement doesn’t amount to avert any storm. It requires drawing up solid pragmatic actions and sticking to them. What I would also like to impress upon you, Mr Desperado, is the need to demarkate religion from public sphere and relagate it to the comfort of the private. Pluralism, properly conducted, is the answer. That wold allow bigots, zealots and rational headed individuals to co-exist.
So please, for the sake of your country and my country, dont align yourself with bloodthirsty mutineers.
MQM is the only party that has the ability to lead our country through rough waters, that believes in rule of law, rights of all people, regardless of their caste or class, Altaf Hussain Bhai, the only leader in Pakistan who really shares the pain and sorrows of his people.
So here is a beautiful and inspiring piece of poetry dedicated to Altaf Hussain Bhai…Enjoy it and also Please do share it with others and spread MQM’s message of love.
TRIBUTE TO A GREAT Quaid ALTAF HUSSAIN
BY SYED KAMRAN
There are many kinds of leaders
But there are very few
Who turn out to be good leaders
And excel in all they do they do.
The way things ought to be
And sets a good example for
Everyone to see.
He teaches us to try our best
And strives to make us better
Yet must insist the rules be met
Right down to the letter.
Fairness and integrity
Must be realized
They play the most important part
And can’t be compromised.
Talent on this level
Can’t be found everywhere
But i know one great leader.
His name is Altaf Hussain
————————————————————————————————————————-
JEEAY MUTTAHIDA! JEEAY ALTAF HUSSAIN BHAI!
Faisal Javaid, it is interesting to note your avoidance of name ‘Javaid’ and substituting it with “Desperado” – I am certain that you are not familiar with this term, if you did I can’t imagine you using it as part of your name (I am, here, assuming you to be a God fearing person!). A desparado in the Nineteenth Century was noramlly a ‘drunkard’ and later in the Twenteeth Century the word was used for a “dangerous criminal / an outlaw”. I am sure you do not fit in these categories of, unfortunately, pathetic condition.
Now, since you appear so proud of using your professional qualifications (ACMA & ACA are no mean achievements !) which makes ‘numbers’ / ‘quantities’ / ‘figures’ your buisness. You appear a bit too outrageously cavalier with numbers when you refer “What was done in the Lal Masjid with those 1000s..”. Thousands ! How many ?
I would have expected a qualified accountant, who like to ’show off’, to be more prudent with numbers here. Is that what you do with numbers professionally as well?
You know exactly what “Talibans” are & what their agendas are and no deceptions like, students (Ilm Ka Talib or whaever), would camouflage them; like a place which is used to store arms & ammunition and planning for anti state / subversive activities can not become a mosque even if you desire to name it a mosque and paint it with any color ‘lal’ / ‘peela’ or ‘green’!
I am assuming that you are just a bit emmotional and have let sentamentality rule while writing; and your writing is not result of premeditated lies and tinkering with facts. Let’s be guided by following:
Surah Al-Baqarah (2:42); “And mix not truth with falsehood, nor conceal the truth…..”
Prophet (peace be upon him) said;
a) “Maintain truthfulness, for truthfulness leads to righteousness, and righteousness leads to Heaven. A man continues to maintain truthfulness until he is recorded in Allah’s book as “truthful”. Refrain from lying, because lying leads to blatant evil, and evil leads to the fire. A man continues to lie until he is recorded in Allah’s book as a “liar”.”
b) “The signs of a hypocrite are three; when he speaks, he lies; when he makes a promise, he breaks it; and when he is entrusted with something, he betrays that trust.”
Let me remind myself first and then you that once the Prophet (peace be upon him) was asked “Can a Muslim be a coward? He replied; “Yes” He was then asked: “Can a Muslim be a miser?” He replied: “Yes.”Finally, he was asked: “Can a Muslim be a liar?” The Prophet (peace be upon him) firmly replied: “No, a Muslim never lies.”
hahaha,
abay salo tum log kia koi ganta suggestion doge , pehlay khud to sudar jao aik dusro pay taunt karnay k bajiy khud ko sahi karoo ,Desperado mujhay khud Taliban ka banda lag raha hai SALIM apna # barha raha hi, aur Rashid bhai ,aik dam jhakas ” jiye Muthidiya” aur khas tor pay AFTAB S. ASLAM , jo khud koi sahi bat karnay say qasir hai aur agar koi dusra apni bat keh raha hai to kabhe us k desperado nam hone per kabhe uski qualification pay to kabhe uski galatiyo ko pointout kar raha hai,sirf apna # barhanay k liye
abay KACHAAR tum jese ko Road pay khara kar k goli mar dene chahiye ta k buriy aik he sath khatam ho jye or dusro ko critize karnay walay khatam ho gyn gay to mulk khud he set ho jye ga
JIYE MQM
Hi aftab Alam,
“Therefore let us keep the feast,not with old leaven,niether with the leaven of malice and wickedness; but with unleavened bread of sincerity and TRUTH.”(corinthians 5/8)
“God is a spirit; and they that worship him must worship HIm in spirit and TRUTH”(sT.jOHN 4/24)
If one cannot be truthful, i think nothing matters.
I thanks Dr.Razah haider for this post though i have not read the Holy Quoran or Bible and so cannot debate on this issue but i feel he has been TUTHFUL IN THIS POST.
Is papu a joke or a reject from a c grade bollywood flick? Are there any moderators at TPS who screen such bigot comments. And how’s papu’s bloodlust for killing critics on the street any different from talibani zealots that the equally zealot mqm so violently opposes?
Creeps like papu should be thrown in the same cage as hardcore fundo talibanis
Raza,
It is India. It is India.
Destroy her and all the problems will be solved. Just destroy her.
Raza one question to you answer it please;
Are you a Muhajirs?