Begging won’t budge Bharat
By Aftab Alam • Feb 26th, 2010 • Category: Politics • 9 CommentsThose who believe that Hindus will throw anything in our bowl by begging are nonbelievers Muslims!!! The more we beg for the pretentious talks the more they (viz Bharat) will become rigid. Bharat would never ever be able to budge a little in dispute of Kashmir, until & unless we would be able to force them to budge. If the Brahmins have not been able to own and adopt their centuries old; (i) 50 % co-religion and co-region, they calling them with out caste, (ii) the more allied than ally, the Sikhs, (iii) and the only Hindu State, Nepal in her armpit.
Then how they would be so luxurious, lush & push to forget Muslims 1000 years rule and accept us on the basis of equality as an esteemed country. So the imperative lesson we can infer is: to maintain the status quo, without any giving in, till the enemy become worn out (e.g. Portugal and UK) or we become sturdier e.g. China. Then that will be the proper time to talk and dictate. That was the way the China snatched the Macau, Hong Kong and sooner or later she would be able to snatch the Taiwan. And as far as the compulsions of diplomacy are concerned, like Bharat, harping on the tune of dialogue is no harmful.
The overture of waves after waves incoming Hindus delegations of dancers, NGOs, drummers and others of the sort is simply their diplomatic gimmick on one hand and hereditary merchandising compulsions on the other. We & they are as contrasting as the life and death or fire and water have been, so we can’t coexist amicably. We can coexist only in equilibrium, e.g. the US & Russia had/has been.
If the Brahmin Hindus are not willing to give up or give back the stolen Siachen Glacier, which is tip of the iceberg then how and what far they would be willing to donate us the Kashmir, which is skull of the region!!!
So far UN Security Council resolutions on Kashmir are concerned, one must remember the Divine Law, discovered by Sir Isaac Newton, known as Newton’s first law of motion: which states that, “if a body is at rest or moving at a constant speed in a straight line, it will remain at rest or keep moving in a straight line at constant speed unless it is acted upon by a force”.
Facing a beat is no defeat but surrendering to a beat is the defeat!!!
Trackback URL
|
|
|
Click For More Articles By Aftab Alam
Aftab Alam Advocate (High Court)
President District Bar Association Swat
All posts by Aftab Alam
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
“until & unless we would be able to force them to budge”
Hahahaha……Dear Author…….force does not work with BHARAT
Ask the americans for confirmation.
Force never worked with Bharat.Never will.
Brahmins form only 3% of India’s population
Therefore , most of the points does not hold.
@BL
LOL, do you still remember 24 December 1999. I agree with author, India is behaving like a rouge elephant.
If we want peace with our neighbors then we should learn a lesson from our history.
My dear Satish,
Yes , what happened on 24th December , 1999? Plz enlighten me.
i wanna know.
Then i will show u the “other” side.
@BL
Are u kidding me…..search on-line and you will find an answer to your query.
@Satish
i know what happened.
Now let me show u “The Other Side”
1)India became ” victim of terror” in the eyes of world, thus getting sympathy of the world.
2)Indian propaganda made sure Pakistan became the ” evil one” , thus getting hatred.
3)Most importantly, world recognized “terrorism in Kashmir” NOT “freedom struggle”.
Guess who got the advantage????
A piece of News for you:-
In a recent survey…..66% Americans said India is a “good and responsible” Nation.
Only 23 % said the same about Pakistan.
More u commit terrorism against India…….more will India gain from it.
@BL
1) India became ” victim of terror” in the eyes of world, thus getting sympathy of the world.
Answer : India has used similar tactics in past and by virtue of such tactics India succeeded in gaining some commiseration of the world. In 1971 it used its own agents to hijack an Indian plane to Pakistan. The hijackers posed as Kashmiri militants but were Indian agents. The plane was hijacked to blame Pakistan for assisting terrorists. The ruse was used to stop West Pakistani over-flights to East Pakistan. The RAW agents who had been given asylum in Pakistan were arrested and later confessed to the entire drama.
2)Indian propaganda made sure Pakistan became the ” evil one” , thus getting hatred.
Answer : True
3)Most importantly, world recognized “terrorism in Kashmir” NOT “freedom struggle”.
Answer : There are estimated 700,000 Indian soldiers and paramilitaries in Kashmir who are committing torture, disappearances, arbitrary detentions and summary executions, which are concealed as “encounter killings”. Since 1989, more than 20,000 Kashmiri civilians have been killed and over over 8,000 Kashmiris have simply “disappeared” as a result of the armed conflict and tens of thousands more have been injured according to the HRW report. Now I call this “Indian terrorism in Kashmir”.
OMG, you can’t be so naive who would trust American survey, FYI their (Americans) own approval rating as a nation is below 20% in the world and you expect us to trust their opinion…..give me a break.
Pakistan is not interested in committing terrorism against its neighbours.
Dialogue is not necessity of Pakistan, it is Indian necessity - they need time to achieve the status of “untouchables” and like it or dislike it, they are moving ahead. I do agree budging on Kashmir is out of question for India. What are we doing? Musical chair of power game! Media fastening their belts against Zardari, all core issues - God is Great, the Mercifful the Beneficient.
Dialogue is the prime necessity of India. They have bitten the dust on the application of permanent membership of Security Council on the sole ground of Kashmir dispute. Their politicians are trying hard to give the message to the world that they are having dialogues with Pakistan, so condone this objection. If Pakistan remains as fool as she looks, may be Indians succeed.
Hostile Bharat is far better than cordial
Pakistan’s over all advancement in the last 62 years might be the poorest but in defense. And which has taught the best manners to Bharat. And the credit goes to the hostile Bharat!!! So the hard lessen is that hostile Bharat is far better than the cordial!!!
If Bharat could not budge even an inch in the clear most issues of Sciachen, Sir Creek, Baglihar Dam and in Kishan Ganga Dam. Then a moonstruck person of a very high grade can subscribe to the idea that Bharat would ever deliver on Kashmir.
Her history has proved over and over again only one thing and that is; Bharat can only be relied upon in enmity and never in amity. Being the evil twins Bharat & Israel have been fluent only in the language of force.