It is the same old thing that you are repeating again.

But you have not answered other things, I have asked many more question than just the Saeed one.

Are you a coward? Cant even answer the questions asked by people younger to you.

No body may do the way the Great Pakistanis they do.

Any how Mumbai attack was internal job of Indian Raw to escalate a war against Pakistan in which the enemy of Pakistan they failed miserably. You may find few articles here in TPS. Please look for A Khokar posts of last year. Good positive discussions were generated then.

I think I did give reply on the subject query of setting Mr Saeed free some where.
Any how: The man was held by police when UN security council came out with banning of person and his organisation on allegation of his involvement in some nefarious terrorist activities.

He was held and his Organisation was banned all right but courts—- they need solid evidence to defunct or condemn a person, Court found that evidence supplied by India or UN security council was not sufficient to defunct a person. Personal whims or wishful thinking may not serve any purpose. Thus the man has been set free. The man can be tried any time again if the evidences hold any waters.

Pakistan is not some despotic regime. Freedom is guaranteed here and the culprits are also dealt with properly as you can see that its traitors called as Taliban are eventually being dealt with in Swat and Malakand area; humiliation and death is the verdict for these stooges.

If you go through the comment below it then you will see that I have used your Name properly and have done it everytime.

Also the both the names have subtle differences in their meaning Speak Free means speak without fear and openly and Free Speech is what the polticians do.

By the way dont try to run away from the questions that I have asked you.

# 6

I wrote the name at random and some how it came out as ‘Free speech’ where as you preferred to be called as ‘Speak free’. I am sorry that even simple change which was owing to a typo but it did hurt you.

Any how in both the cases the given names denote that man loves the freedom of speech. But from where you got this notion that it is being disrespectful to you?

But contrary to you own set and preferred rules you have written my name:

Dear KKhoKKar,

Would you please like to reconcile?

Answer the questions and then we can talk again.

Otherwise hide yourself in your wife’s or wives anchal, cause you are not strong enough to face a man.

You are saying that people don’t believe whatever Obama said in his speech from Cairo. Fine, there choice. But doesn’t it look similar to the promises Pakistan makes with India. After the 26/11 Mumbai incident, Pakistan said they will bring everyone to justice and this and that. But nothing happened. Saeed was set free saying no evidence against him.

What about the statement passed by the Attorney general of Pakistan who made a statement a couple of days earlier stating they have proof of JuD and AQ links and Saeed being involved in it.

One Indian Prime Minister rides in bus to make friendship and peace with Pakistan and your army General attacks India in Kargil.

Where is the credibility of Pakistan? Should anyone trust Pakistan for whatever they say? Or is it just a farce.

Your Prime Minister is making statement that India should come ahead talk with Pakistan on Kashmir front. But what about the things that happened in Mumbai? Why is Saeed and his people set free?

Answer these and then try to say something against other people.

At least try to respect a person and use their name properly.

Every article carries a theme and topic or subject, put across for the readers to ponder upon and when the readers feel that they can come up with some suggestion or a better solution toward the implementation of subject theme or contribute toward forming an opinion; not all but only few may come forward and put up their comment.

Only cultivating of an opinion in the favour of theme is expected and not any praises for an article. I believe that article must only be put up to understand the burning issue well, so that people may be assisted to act accordingly.

Although Obama has promised few things in his speech but his audience they have the reservation in believing him; not even in America? Obama promises are seen fake, just words and no substance. It is like the promises of Juvenile, who has just fallen in love with a girl on first site and while in the grip of aroused emotions is cutting a promise to marrying her without asking his or her parents and the consequences. Obama seem not to have the support of both the houses back home neither he has got the backing of Pentagon.

Any how Obama was on excursion to repair the damaged image of America and trying to arrange some deceptive window dressing by sticking some soft labels to soften up the US distorted image. In this regard he may cut few favours back home.

With regard to Pakistan; the man is poised to send the drones for attack with the banner flying at the back; I love You. [1]

Any how when the picture is so confused and people are so eluded; how they can come up and put up some comments. I have seen that a lot has been written in regards to Obama speech in all the news papers and blogs in America as well as across the world; but there are very few comments.

Illusions and stories of cuckoo lands may not fetch any opinions.

(You too have come up here not to comment on the article theme—- but for leg pulling of Mr A Khokar.)
Any how; Hold your applause has been put up here for info only and is not written by me.

[1] ( For Cartoon please link adab-arez.co.uk)