Comments on: A Helmet: For a sake of life or for a sake of revenue? http://www.pkhope.com/a-helmet-for-a-sake-of-life-or-for-a-sake-of-revenue/ A Candid Blog Fri, 18 May 2012 01:06:04 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 By: Muhammad Waqar http://www.pkhope.com/a-helmet-for-a-sake-of-life-or-for-a-sake-of-revenue/comment-page-1/#comment-1765576 Muhammad Waqar Mon, 20 Dec 2010 08:22:39 +0000 http://www.pakspectator.com/a-helmet-for-a-sake-of-life-or-for-a-sake-of-revenue/#comment-1765576 Helmet Law: It’s foolish step of Traffic Police because I observed many times that traffic warden ignores all thing (i.e Indicators, fron/back light working or not, overtaking, road lines etc) but they strictly wished-for to fine them that driving their bike without helmet whether they are following all other rules and don’t disturb other vehicles. And many times you have watched that they do not charge all persons who are driving without helmet, but anybody asks them that this rule is for all persons or just for youngsters & poor people??? Above discussion (Mahtab Bashir) demonstrating right that Fine is for sake of revenue not for the LIFE OF POOR PEOPLE/YOUNGSTERS!!! Helmet Law: It’s foolish step of Traffic Police because I observed many times that traffic warden ignores all thing (i.e Indicators, fron/back light working or not, overtaking, road lines etc) but they strictly wished-for to fine them that driving their bike without helmet whether they are following all other rules and don’t disturb other vehicles. And many times you have watched that they do not charge all persons who are driving without helmet, but anybody asks them that this rule is for all persons or just for youngsters & poor people???
Above discussion (Mahtab Bashir) demonstrating right that Fine is for sake of revenue not for the LIFE OF POOR PEOPLE/YOUNGSTERS!!!

]]> By: jett http://www.pkhope.com/a-helmet-for-a-sake-of-life-or-for-a-sake-of-revenue/comment-page-1/#comment-54743 jett Thu, 10 Jul 2008 03:15:18 +0000 http://www.pakspectator.com/a-helmet-for-a-sake-of-life-or-for-a-sake-of-revenue/#comment-54743 I can't say about Pakistan but I live in a state with no helmet law but wear it anyway. It saved my life once. Helmet law...a good thing everywhere. I can’t say about Pakistan but I live in a state with no helmet law but wear it anyway. It saved my life once. Helmet law…a good thing everywhere.

]]> By: Dr Razahaider http://www.pkhope.com/a-helmet-for-a-sake-of-life-or-for-a-sake-of-revenue/comment-page-1/#comment-53179 Dr Razahaider Mon, 07 Jul 2008 15:28:09 +0000 http://www.pakspectator.com/a-helmet-for-a-sake-of-life-or-for-a-sake-of-revenue/#comment-53179 Habit is a behavior or quality that develops through the healthy or unhealthy act of person without utilizing the conscious in to a quality that becomes its characteristics. Similarly practice is a similar synonymous act that becomes a quality of individual through the platform of repetition. Although both synonymous terms are used to express the qualities of individual act as excellence or quality trait yet the contextual difference between the two is only evident when the terms are unanimously put in discussion of repetitive acts. These repetitive acts when isolated are restricted to the domain of individual acquired trait whereas when it is practice at large resides on the plateau of acquired practice of society. A practice that becomes a dominant trait of society becomes the part of behavior. Such behaviors at grass root levels escapes attention however when it regains a power and dominancy it is transformed in to attitude. Attitude at individual level can be encountered by counseling, briefing, and resolving the clash and to the maximum punishing but such dominant trait at large can only be monitored by addressing at large and implementing rules and regulation as penalty so to instruct in peaceful mode the requirement and abidance of the idea thus restricting to halt the attitude. After going through your article cum reservation it is an impression that you have dominant problem of attitude that needs counseling as it has taken a clear picture of clash to the said requirement of essentiality as life saving procedure. Dear please do not get annoyed, the same attitude is the problem of almost every individual including me in Pakistan. Your reserving comments have very important elements of other essential paraphernalia’s as well, but as per your contextual requirement of article I would simply run on the same road to wearing of helmet and its abidance. Islamabad police is one of the polish and sophisticatedly equipped police of Pakistan. Correlating different issues with your habit and practices of violating attitude is a real mismatch. We can not simply tag rules /regulation and implementation of law by saying that there are more issues on the run to solve. In a well-mannered society ,abidance of traffic rules express the attitude towards writ of the state and its governance .This also express the turn out of citizen towards their moral obligations towards law and legislation as well. The prerogative to charge a challan of 100 Rs is the authority of the state that is being granted to him in lieu of penalty for any such individual who breach or breaks law. Similarly the state or the authority has the prerogative to confiscate and award punishment from license to arrest on repeated act of breach. Habit is a behavior or quality that develops through the healthy or unhealthy act of person without utilizing the conscious in to a quality that becomes its characteristics.

Similarly practice is a similar synonymous act that becomes a quality of individual through the platform of repetition.

Although both synonymous terms are used to express the qualities of individual act as excellence or quality trait yet the contextual difference between the two is only evident when the terms are unanimously put in discussion of repetitive acts.

These repetitive acts when isolated are restricted to the domain of individual acquired trait whereas when it is practice at large resides on the plateau of acquired practice of society.

A practice that becomes a dominant trait of society becomes the part of behavior.

Such behaviors at grass root levels escapes attention however when it regains a power and dominancy it is transformed in to attitude.

Attitude at individual level can be encountered by counseling, briefing, and resolving the clash and to the maximum punishing but such dominant trait at large can only be monitored by addressing at large and implementing rules and regulation as penalty so to instruct in peaceful mode the requirement and abidance of the idea thus restricting to halt the attitude.

After going through your article cum reservation it is an impression that you have dominant problem of attitude that needs counseling as it has taken a clear picture of clash to the said requirement of essentiality as life saving procedure.

Dear please do not get annoyed, the same attitude is the problem of almost every individual including me in Pakistan.

Your reserving comments have very important elements of other essential paraphernalia’s as well, but as per your contextual requirement of article I would simply run on the same road to wearing of helmet and its abidance.

Islamabad police is one of the polish and sophisticatedly equipped police of Pakistan.

Correlating different issues with your habit and practices of violating attitude is a real mismatch.

We can not simply tag rules /regulation and implementation of law by saying that there are more issues on the run to solve.

In a well-mannered society ,abidance of traffic rules express the attitude towards writ of the state and its governance .This also express the turn out of citizen towards their moral obligations towards law and legislation as well.

The prerogative to charge a challan of 100 Rs is the authority of the state that is being granted to him in lieu of penalty for any such individual who breach or breaks law.

Similarly the state or the authority has the prerogative to confiscate and award punishment from license to arrest on repeated act of breach.

]]>